On 7/10/2021 10:20 AM, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote:
I guess that video is totally false or I'm missing something
There is no easier way to cheat than using benchmarks... ;-)
Ralf
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
So., 11. Juli 2021, 01:19:
>
>
> > On Jul 10, 2021, at 11:18 AM, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal <
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> >
> > A constexpr function means that it must be computable at compile time if
> > all of its arguments are also
> On Jul 10, 2021, at 11:18 AM, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> A constexpr function means that it must be computable at compile time if
> all of its arguments are also constexpr.
So like the "pure" functions that Gareth was working on? Seems to have moved on
from the idea but I
> On Jul 9, 2021, at 4:56 PM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
>
>> Current standings at the time of this video
>> Iterations per sec:
>> Ada: 67
>> Pascal: 143
>> Fastest language: 7301
>> Slowest language: 1
>
> So Pascal failed pretty bad it looks like. ;)
I just ran that unit with -O2 and got nearly
On 10/07/2021 18:46, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote:
> Here's the C++ version that won. Looks like the magic comes from constexpr,
> which I don't understand very well in C++ except that it's a constant
> expression. Can anyone explain how constexpr works here?
A constexpr function means that
> On Jul 10, 2021, at 4:16 AM, Guillermo via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I remember years ago a similar test in a web page. Pascal was way low
> in the list, even below Java and Python! but we (in a forum) found that
> it wasn't Pascal fault: most versons program were optimised in code
Hi,
I remember years ago a similar test in a web page. Pascal was way low
in the list, even below Java and Python! but we (in a forum) found that
it wasn't Pascal fault: most versons program were optimised in code
while Pascal used brute force (also compiling using -O3 made it way
faster than
On 09/07/2021 23:56, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Jul 9, 2021, at 11:40 AM, Wayne Sherman via fpc-pascal
wrote:
Current standings at the time of this video
Iterations per sec:
Ada: 67
Pascal: 143
Fastest language: 7301
Slowest language: 1
So Pascal failed pretty bad it looks like.
On 10/07/2021 00:56, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 9, 2021, at 11:40 AM, Wayne Sherman via fpc-pascal
>> wrote:
>>
>> Current standings at the time of this video
>> Iterations per sec:
>> Ada: 67
>> Pascal: 143
>> Fastest language: 7301
>> Slowest language: 1
>
> So Pascal
> On Jul 9, 2021, at 11:40 AM, Wayne Sherman via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> Current standings at the time of this video
> Iterations per sec:
> Ada: 67
> Pascal: 143
> Fastest language: 7301
> Slowest language: 1
So Pascal failed pretty bad it looks like. ;)
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
Ohh Nooo!
Back in the 80s.
Winni
Am 09.07.21 um 19:40 schrieb Wayne Sherman via fpc-pascal:
If you are a speed geek, you will probably be interested in this.
What is the FASTEST Computer Language? 45 Languages Tested! (E01)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQtFdsEcK_s
Current standings at
If you are a speed geek, you will probably be interested in this.
What is the FASTEST Computer Language? 45 Languages Tested! (E01)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQtFdsEcK_s
Current standings at the time of this video
Iterations per sec:
Ada: 67
Pascal: 143
Fastest language: 7301
Slowest
12 matches
Mail list logo
