Am 28.09.2010 21:03, schrieb Vincent Snijders:
2010/9/28 Jürgen Hestermannjuergen.hesterm...@gmx.de:
Sven Barth schrieb:
It's enough code, because FillByte (and others) are defined with a var
parameter and such the hint (not a warning) won't go away.
It's an old topic already and we have just
On 27 September 2010 10:26, Jim wrote:
FillByte(tag, SizeOf(tag), 0); //initialize var.
The compiler warning doesn't go away though.
I've had the same problem a few monts ago, and I hate compiler
hints/warnings in my code. The issue is the var parameters, and the
FPC developers already stated
It seems that we need a new parameter modifier out_non_finalize since out
includes a finalization.
We had a similar discussion with constref.
Maybe we need a comprehensive method to describe calling conventions, see e.g.
http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=16697 or the discussion about in
Sven Barth schrieb:
But why not simply change the definition of the variable to out?
Then the
Fill* functions would be recognized as initializing routines.
No, see http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17020
@Jürgen:
That's what I meant, when I said it's an old topic. ;)
Yes, I see now.
On 27-9-2010 13:30, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 27.09.2010 10:38, schrieb Honza:
2010/9/27 Jimhakki...@gmail.com:
As TIfdTag seems to contain non-pointer records only, I thought I could
use Sizeof and tried this:
FillByte(tag, SizeOf(tag), 0); //initialize var.
The compiler warning doesn't go away
Sven Barth schrieb:
It's enough code, because FillByte (and others) are defined with a var
parameter and such the hint (not a warning) won't go away.
It's an old topic already and we have just to live with it (regarding
the Fill* functions). ^^
But why not simply change the definition of the
2010/9/28 Jürgen Hestermann juergen.hesterm...@gmx.de:
Sven Barth schrieb:
It's enough code, because FillByte (and others) are defined with a var
parameter and such the hint (not a warning) won't go away.
It's an old topic already and we have just to live with it (regarding the
Fill*
Hi,
Fpc sometimes complains (hints) about local variables not being initialized.
My question: how do I initialize more complicated structures like
records? And should I need to (I'm guessing no in the example below, but
the contents of the record will be undefined - no problem as there are
no
2010/9/27 Jim hakki...@gmail.com:
Fpc sometimes complains (hints) about local variables not being initialized.
My question: how do I initialize more complicated structures like
records? And should I need to (I'm guessing no in the example below, but
the contents of the record will be undefined
Am 27.09.2010 10:38, schrieb Honza:
2010/9/27 Jimhakki...@gmail.com:
As TIfdTag seems to contain non-pointer records only, I thought I could
use Sizeof and tried this:
FillByte(tag, SizeOf(tag), 0); //initialize var.
The compiler warning doesn't go away though.
Is this the recommended way of
10 matches
Mail list logo
