In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
> >
> > Afaik Michael always works with trunk fpdoc, but of course the 3.0.2 docs
> > were generated in march.
>
> The $if support was added recently to pscanner.
Ah ok, so it was $if vs $ifdef? Anyway, for now I added fs32bit deprecation
to major
On Sat, 3 Jun 2017 01:02:35 +0200 (CEST)
mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
> In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
> > mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
> >
> > >[...]
> > > {$if not defined(fs32bit)}
> > > off_t= cint64; { used for file sizes
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
> mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
>
> >[...]
> > {$if not defined(fs32bit)}
> > off_t= cint64; { used for file sizes }
> > {$else}
> > off_t= cint;
> > {$endif}
> >[...]
> > Maybe we could clean it out. W
On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:50:57 +0200 (CEST)
mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
>[...]
> {$if not defined(fs32bit)}
> off_t= cint64; { used for file sizes }
> {$else}
> off_t= cint;
> {$endif}
>[...]
> Maybe we could clean it out. Why the documentation tool p
On 02/06/17 11:00, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:> > 8 apparently, but off_t is
documented as a cint32.> >
https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/current/rtl/unixtype/off_t.html
The declaration is
{$if not defined(fs32bit)}off_t= cint64;
In our previous episode, Marco van de Voort said:
>
> FPC_USE_LIBC for linux and *bsd still is still hardly used afaik.
>
> Maybe we could clean it out.
These sentences came close together while composing the message, so to be
clear: I didn't mean cleaning out FPC_USE_LIBC, only the fs32bit def
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
>
> 8 apparently, but off_t is documented as a cint32.
>
> https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/current/rtl/unixtype/off_t.html
The declaration is
{$if not defined(fs32bit)}
off_t= cint64; { used for file sizes }
{$else
On 02/06/17 10:00, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:> Could I have a reality check
please: is there no fpLSeek64() for files > larger than 2Gb?
Afaik, there is no such posix calls. In the past, most linux temporarily
hadsome -64 calls while it left the m
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
> Could I have a reality check please: is there no fpLSeek64() for files
> larger than 2Gb?
Afaik, there is no such posix calls. In the past, most linux temporarily had
some -64 calls while it left the main calls 32-bit to make transition
smoother,
Could I have a reality check please: is there no fpLSeek64() for files
larger than 2Gb?
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc
10 matches
Mail list logo