On 20/11/10 13:48, Fantomas wrote:
...
Sorry, but what do think is awesome? That you can only write .NET
applications for Windows Phone 7? That's what I call terrible (which is
basically the contrary of "awesome").
Of course, I meant that it's terrible and horrible, for I like WM and
FreePasca
>> Then, it is awesome, is not it? As for me, WM and its API was quite
>> comprehensible and convenient to develope applications in my favourite
>> Pascal. There was large number of devices running under WM. Fotunately, there
>> is a lot of ones so far.
> Sorry, but what do think is awesome? That
On 20.11.2010 13:43, Fantomas wrote:
Free Pascal applications won't run on Windows Phone 7, but they might run on
"pure" Windows CE 6 and 7 systems (not tested though).
Will not they really run under Windows Phone?
At least not on unhacked devices, cause they only allow .NET
applications (mo
>>> Free Pascal applications won't run on Windows Phone 7, but they might run on
>>> "pure" Windows CE 6 and 7 systems (not tested though).
>>
>> Will not they really run under Windows Phone?
> At least not on unhacked devices, cause they only allow .NET
> applications (more precise: Silverlight
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> For me Windows Mobile is THE free mobile OS on the market. I can write
> applications in any language I want (which supports Windows Mobile...), I
> can play around in the OS as I want it. I can basically do anything with
> that Phone that is
Dnia 19-11-2010 o 14:24:26 Sven Barth
napisał(a):
Am 19.11.2010 10:13, schrieb Florian Klaempfl:
Am 17.11.2010 16:26, schrieb Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Matt Emson
wrote:
There is little chance that will happen as it assumes Nokia will
focus on
Meego...
Am 19.11.2010 10:13, schrieb Florian Klaempfl:
Am 17.11.2010 16:26, schrieb Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Matt Emson
wrote:
There is little chance that will happen as it assumes Nokia will focus on
Meego... Nokia can't focus on a blade of grass on a sunny day
Am 17.11.2010 16:26, schrieb Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Matt Emson
> wrote:
>> There is little chance that will happen as it assumes Nokia will focus on
>> Meego... Nokia can't focus on a blade of grass on a sunny day - they will
>> carry on as is IMO and be s
Sent from my iPhone 4
On 18 Nov 2010, at 08:31, Max Vlasov wrote:
> But I thought about it recently and I think at least that there's a platform
> that could be such - Symbian.
Never developed for Symbian using their native SDK, but as an OS - Symbian is
extremely backwards. What doesn't
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Matt Emson
> wrote:
> > There is little chance that will happen as it assumes Nokia will focus on
> > Meego... Nokia can't focus on a blade of grass on a su
Sent from my iPhone 4
On 17 Nov 2010, at 15:26, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
wrote:
> Which smartphone platform do you recommend then?
None of them are ideal at the moment. From a Free Pascal perspective, iPhone
has the best support. If I was choosing, I'd probably go for Windows Phone 7
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Matt Emson
wrote:
> There is little chance that will happen as it assumes Nokia will focus on
> Meego... Nokia can't focus on a blade of grass on a sunny day - they will
> carry on as is IMO and be shamed in to releasing cheap and shoddy hardware
> in a few years
On 17/11/2010 09:16, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
You could try MeeGo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MeeGo
Which is. at least in this instance, based on Maemo.
At the moment with this phone: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N900
My best advice - and this is real world experience sp
Am 17.11.2010 10:16, schrieb Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
And now comes Windows Phone 7 and destroys this dream mobile OS of mine.
Thank you Microsoft.
You could try MeeGo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MeeGo
At the moment with this phone: ht
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
> And now comes Windows Phone 7 and destroys this dream mobile OS of mine.
> Thank you Microsoft.
You could try MeeGo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MeeGo
At the moment with this phone: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N900
I hope that in 2011
Am 16.11.2010 23:07, schrieb Max Vlasov:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Sven Barth mailto:pascaldra...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
At least not on unhacked devices, cause they only allow .NET
applications (more precise: Silverlight and XNA applications). One
of those decisions that I c
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Max Vlasov wrote:
> > Sven, although I understand what you're talking about, I think this is a
> > case when MS partially learned from their own mistakes as
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Max Vlasov wrote:
> Sven, although I understand what you're talking about, I think this is a
> case when MS partially learned from their own mistakes as well as from
> google success.
No, it has nothing to do with it.
They really are just evil, unethical and not
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> At least not on unhacked devices, cause they only allow .NET applications
> (more precise: Silverlight and XNA applications). One of those decisions
> that I can not (and want not) understand...
>
>
Sven, although I understand what you're talkin
Am 16.11.2010 12:02, schrieb Fantomas:
Free Pascal applications won't run on Windows Phone 7, but they might
run on "pure" Windows CE 6 and 7 systems (not tested though).
Will not they really run under Windows Phone?
At least not on unhacked devices, cause they only allow .NET
applications
> Free Pascal applications won't run on Windows Phone 7, but they might
> run on "pure" Windows CE 6 and 7 systems (not tested though).
Will not they really run under Windows Phone?
--
Best regards,
Fantomas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lis
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 12.11.2010 14:56, Uffe Kousgaard wrote:
>
>> Does the output from the wince compiler work with specific versions of win
>> CE?
>>
>> This page lists versions 3.0, 4.20 and 5.2 :
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Mobile
>>
>
> I had test
On 12.11.2010 14:56, Uffe Kousgaard wrote:
Does the output from the wince compiler work with specific versions of win
CE?
This page lists versions 3.0, 4.20 and 5.2 :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Mobile
I had tested it on Windows Pocket PC 2003, Windows Mobile 5, 6, 6.5 and
6.5.3. Of
Does the output from the wince compiler work with specific versions of win
CE?
This page lists versions 3.0, 4.20 and 5.2 :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Mobile
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepasca
24 matches
Mail list logo
