On 07/04/2013 05:24 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
In any event, my experience is that USB->serial converters are very poor
Same here !
Standard USB stuff is not really suitable for embedded use.
Due to electrical disturbances the data on the USB line can be corrupted
and the link between h
Hi,
Can this thread please be moved to the fpc-other list?
Thanks,
Jonas
FPC mailing lists admin
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Luca Olivetti wrote:
Al 04/07/13 17:24, En/na Mark Morgan Lloyd ha escrit:
In any event, my experience is that USB->serial converters are very poor
for anything that involves accurate timing, and I suspect that
controlling a 485 transceiver in conjunction with one would be
problematic.
Not if
Al 04/07/13 17:24, En/na Mark Morgan Lloyd ha escrit:
> In any event, my experience is that USB->serial converters are very poor
> for anything that involves accurate timing, and I suspect that
> controlling a 485 transceiver in conjunction with one would be
> problematic.
Not if the converter ma
On 04/07/2013 16:24, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Lukasz Sokol wrote:
>> On 04/07/2013 12:03, Michael Schnell wrote:
>>> On 07/04/2013 12:52 PM, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
For RS485 adaptation, use a MAX232 like chip (to convert +-12
to ttl) and then a RS485 transceiver chip;
>>> If you want to cr
Lukasz Sokol wrote:
On 04/07/2013 12:03, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 07/04/2013 12:52 PM, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
For RS485 adaptation, use a MAX232 like chip (to convert +-12 to
ttl) and then a RS485 transceiver chip;
If you want to create hardware anyway, better use a PIC24 (pr PIC32)
chip with US
On 04/07/2013 12:03, Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 07/04/2013 12:52 PM, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
>> For RS485 adaptation, use a MAX232 like chip (to convert +-12 to
>> ttl) and then a RS485 transceiver chip;
>
> If you want to create hardware anyway, better use a PIC24 (pr PIC32)
> chip with USB plus a R
