really thanks, but my needs are quite basic, and I found my way.
but I keep the link ... me be usefull later!
Thanks
Philippe
On
Tue, 8 Oct 2013 06:07:44 -0500, Michal Wallace wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2013
2:34 PM, "Philippe" wrote:
>
> > Problem!(?) ... I was using window,
gotoxy and so
On Oct 5, 2013 2:34 PM, "Philippe" wrote:
> Problem!(?) ... I was using window, gotoxy and so on ... and I don´t find
anything similar with video unit!
I don't know if this would be useful to you, but I've been working on a
modernized CRT for some time:
- https://github.com/tangentstorm/xpl
it compiles and links ... still a lot of stuff to write and a bunch
to adjust
first tests ... first suprises!!!
but it compiles and
runs ... till the fisrt bug during first steps ...
Philippe
On Sat,
5 Oct 2013 22:48:09 +0200, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Sat, October 5,
2013 21:34, Ph
I really assumed that I had to choice between video unit and crt
unit ...
my old unit which interfaced the video must be updated to be
compiled for win32.
I already though about to create my window
procedure and my gotoxy procedure ... this way I may not have to make a
lot of changes in my
On Sat, October 5, 2013 21:34, Philippe wrote:
>
>
> I am back !!! (a bit sick ... teeth ...)
>
> I am now trying to move
> to win32. At first leaving crt unit, moving to video unit.
>
> Problem!(?)
> ... I was using window, gotoxy and so on ... and I don´t find anything
> similar with video unit!
I am back !!! (a bit sick ... teeth ...)
I am now trying to move
to win32. At first leaving crt unit, moving to video unit.
Problem!(?)
... I was using window, gotoxy and so on ... and I don´t find anything
similar with video unit!
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:02:00 +0200, Sven
Barth wrote:
>
sorry ... delayed answer ... I don´t felt very well these days
and this subject is a bit difficult for me ... but I will give time this
week to read all I received ... and find out a way ... I´ll write later
this week
any way, I thank you very much all for your help!
Philippe
On Thu,
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> >
> > I'm not sure how far along it is, and if it is default. (is the internal
> > linker always default if available?)
> Yes, the internal linker is used by default. See options.pas, line 3246:
>From the code and looking at the i_ records, I'd say that
Am 19.09.2013 22:46, schrieb Tomas Hajny:
On Thu, September 19, 2013 21:55, Sven Barth wrote:
On 19.09.2013 17:28, Tomas Hajny wrote:
.
.
2) You still need at least a linker for the GO32v2 target (FPC internal
linker does not support this target) and that is the somewhat tricky
part.
Hmm?
Am 20.09.2013 09:20, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
In our previous episode, Tomas Hajny said:
Have you checked it in fixes or trunk? In any case, I've tried it directly
with the 2.6.2 binary before posting - even if I pass -Xi explicitly, the
compiler still complains about go32v2-ld.exe not found
In our previous episode, Tomas Hajny said:
> Have you checked it in fixes or trunk? In any case, I've tried it directly
> with the 2.6.2 binary before posting - even if I pass -Xi explicitly, the
> compiler still complains about go32v2-ld.exe not found if it is not
> accessible (and linking fails).
On 19.09.2013 17:28, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Now with with a new PC running Windows 8 ... the
compiler bugs. It works fine with small program but not with one
which executable about 1.5 Mb large (which is my case, I did not checked
till which size it works!).
My program should run in prompt comm
On 18.09.2013 18:48, Philippe wrote:
(first time I am using the mail list ... I may do it wrong!)
I have a quite big program (now with more than 200.000 lines), first
build with TP7. For example it accesses CGA memory through absolute
address ...
Years ago I moved to FPC. And it compiled ok und
On Thu, September 19, 2013 21:55, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 19.09.2013 17:28, Tomas Hajny wrote:
.
.
>> 2) You still need at least a linker for the GO32v2 target (FPC internal
>> linker does not support this target) and that is the somewhat tricky
>> part.
>
> Hmm? Looking at compiler/systems/t_go32
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> It's still maintained. Though it's mostly used on DOS/GO32v2 systems and
> likely with less big projects.
One of the problems with dos maintenance is that there are very few
bugreports with source, and IDE problems are not always reproducable.
On Wed, September 18, 2013 18:48, Philippe wrote:
Hello Philippe,
.
.
> I
> have a quite big program (now with more than 200.000 lines), first build
> with TP7. For example it accesses CGA memory through absolute address
> ...
>
> Years ago I moved to FPC. And it compiled ok under Windows 98
>
On 18/09/13 17:48, Philippe wrote:
> (first time I am using the mail list ... I may do it wrong!)
>
>
>
> I have a quite big program (now with more than 200.000 lines), first
> build with TP7. For example it accesses CGA memory through absolute
> address ...
>
> Years ago I moved to FPC. And it
(first time I am using the mail list ... I may do it wrong!)
I
have a quite big program (now with more than 200.000 lines), first build
with TP7. For example it accesses CGA memory through absolute address
...
Years ago I moved to FPC. And it compiled ok under Windows 98
then under XP.
N
18 matches
Mail list logo
