On 05 Oct 2008, at 13:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If by "the two tests" you mean testing the FPC version vs. testing the
CodeWarrior version, then: yes, I'm pretty sure, since I'm running
them
both on the same machine (a Powerbook G4 laptop running Mac OSX
10.4.11).
The tests are self-cont
Thanks, Jonas --
I'll give that a try and report back.
Bill
> On 04 Oct 2008, at 22:48, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You could try running
>
> sudo fs_usage -w yourapp
>
> to see what exactly is going on at the file system level. Or you can
> start your application and run "sudo fs
Marco --
If by "the two tests" you mean testing the FPC version vs. testing the
CodeWarrior version, then: yes, I'm pretty sure, since I'm running them
both on the same machine (a Powerbook G4 laptop running Mac OSX 10.4.11).
The tests are self-contained within that machine (the LISP code running
In our previous episode, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm not sure if you saw my most recent post, where I described what I was
> actually doing, in response to Jonas's concern that the LISP code might be
> trying to read the FPC-created file before it had been closed.
>
> I'm actually writing to a d
On 04 Oct 2008, at 22:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if you saw my most recent post, where I described what
I was
actually doing, in response to Jonas's concern that the LISP code
might be
trying to read the FPC-created file before it had been closed.
I'm actually writing to a d
Hi, Danie --
I'm not sure if you saw my most recent post, where I described what I was
actually doing, in response to Jonas's concern that the LISP code might be
trying to read the FPC-created file before it had been closed.
I'm actually writing to a dummy file name (suffixed ".TMP"), then closin
On Ma, 2008-09-29 at 11:32 +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 08:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
A bit late, but let's give it a try.
:
> Subject: [fpc-pascal] Re: command-line+Carbon template
:
> Be all that as it may, this whole Rube Goldberg runs gr
On 30 Sep 2008, at 21:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I dealt with that potential source of anomalies way back
in the
original CodeWarrior version: the Pascal code opens and writes out
to the
file under a different name than the one the LISP code is looking for.
Only after the file's
Thanks, Jonas --
Actually, I dealt with that potential source of anomalies way back in the
original CodeWarrior version: the Pascal code opens and writes out to the
file under a different name than the one the LISP code is looking for.
Only after the file's been written and closed is it renamed so
On 28 Sep 2008, at 17:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be all that as it may, this whole Rube Goldberg runs great when
compiled
under CodeWarrior using MPW file i/o routines. With FPC's Turbo
routines,
I'm seeing some strange "race conditions" that lead me to believe
the FPC
version of the pro
I didn't describe the problem I was experiencing becasue it seemed
unlikely that anyone else would ever find themselves in this particular
bind. That, and it didn't seem germane to the question I was asking --
namely, what to include in the project so as to access Carbon file
routines from a comman
11 matches
Mail list logo