[fpc-pascal] Re: fcl-stl in 2.6.2 packaged release (not source code)

2013-04-22 Thread leledumbo
Generics are less advanced in 2.6 compared to trunk, so most generic changes are not merged back atm. Yes, but 2.6.0 and 2.6.2 sources contain fcl-stl source, and it can be compiled with either. -- View this message in context:

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: fcl-stl in 2.6.2 packaged release (not source code)

2013-04-22 Thread Sven Barth
Am 22.04.2013 11:24 schrieb leledumbo leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id: Generics are less advanced in 2.6 compared to trunk, so most generic changes are not merged back atm. Yes, but 2.6.0 and 2.6.2 sources contain fcl-stl source, and it can be compiled with either. Compiled: yes. Linked: not

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: fcl-stl in 2.6.2 packaged release (not source code)

2013-04-22 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, leledumbo said: Yes, but 2.6.0 and 2.6.2 sources contain fcl-stl source, and it can be compiled with either. There is a reason why 2.6.x doesn't compile and package fcl-stl. Sleeping source is considered unsupported. ___

[fpc-pascal] Re: fcl-stl in 2.6.2 packaged release (not source code)

2013-04-22 Thread leledumbo
Compiled: yes. Linked: not so much. The problem is the nested enumerator of TVector which isn't handled correctly by a pre-trunk compiler. And all other fcl-stl depend on TVector some way or the other... Hmm... then maybe I'm lucky enough to have it working, at least on 2.6.2. I only use

[fpc-pascal] Re: fcl-stl in 2.6.2 packaged release (not source code)

2013-04-22 Thread leledumbo
There is a reason why 2.6.x doesn't compile and package fcl-stl. Sleeping source is considered unsupported. OK, though that's quite weird reason. It's better not to include it at all then. -- View this message in context: