Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-19 Thread Florian Klämpfl via fpc-pascal
> Am 19.04.2021 um 07:52 schrieb Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal > : > > Hi, > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: > >>> Am 18.04.2021 um 23:29 schrieb Zamrony P. Juhara via fpc-pascal: >>> >>> I would like to propose to separate RTL release from compiler release >>> so

Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-19 Thread Florian Klämpfl via fpc-pascal
> Am 19.04.2021 um 11:36 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal > : > > > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal wrote: > >> On 19/04/2021 11:28, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: >>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal wrote: On 19/04/2021 09:28,

Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal wrote: On 19/04/2021 11:28, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal wrote: On 19/04/2021 09:28, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: From what you say, both problems are related to

Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-19 Thread Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal
On 19/04/2021 11:28, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal wrote: > >> On 19/04/2021 09:28, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: >>> >>> >>> From what you say, both problems are related to the tool you use. Are >>> there no other

Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal wrote: On 19/04/2021 09:28, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: From what you say, both problems are related to the tool you use. Are there no other tools that can be used ? The wrapping problem is unrelated to the tool, but to the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-19 Thread Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal
On 19/04/2021 09:28, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: > > > From what you say, both problems are related to the tool you use. Are > there no other tools that can be used ? The wrapping problem is unrelated to the tool, but to the console mode focus of our installation files. Such a

Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal wrote: Hi, On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: > The main remaining problem is our hard-wrapped readme and whatsnew files > that look terrible in its installer (because it also performs wrapping > and it uses a

Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-19 Thread Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal
Op 2021-04-19 om 07:52 schreef Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal: No, the RTL and the compiler are tightly coupled. What might be possible are further packages like the FCL and interfaceing units, but the core RTL itself definitely not. I think the need comes from the fact that the release cycle

Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-19 Thread Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal
Hi, On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: > > The main remaining problem is our hard-wrapped readme and whatsnew files > > that look terrible in its installer (because it also performs wrapping > > and it uses a proportional font, so many hard-wrapped lines get wrapped >

Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal wrote: On 19/04/2021 07:59, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: But MacOS is a problem. macOS is also perfectly scriptable, I just have to finish automating it. I didn't mean to imply that it is not scriptable. But it's a problem

Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-19 Thread Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal
On 19/04/2021 07:59, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: > > But MacOS is a problem. macOS is also perfectly scriptable, I just have to finish automating it. The main remaining problem is our hard-wrapped readme and whatsnew files that look terrible in its installer (because it also

Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-18 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal wrote: Hi, On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: Am 18.04.2021 um 23:29 schrieb Zamrony P. Juhara via fpc-pascal: I would like to propose to separate RTL release  from compiler release so that RTL bug fixes and features can

Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-18 Thread Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal
Hi, On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: >> Am 18.04.2021 um 23:29 schrieb Zamrony P. Juhara via fpc-pascal: >> >> I would like to propose to separate RTL release  from compiler release >> so that RTL bug fixes and features can be released with shorter release >> cycle. Is that

Re: [fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-18 Thread Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
Am 18.04.2021 um 23:29 schrieb Zamrony P. Juhara via fpc-pascal: I would like to propose to separate RTL release   from compiler release so that RTL bug fixes and features can be released with shorter release cycle. Is that possible? No, the RTL and the compiler are tightly coupled. What

[fpc-pascal] Separate release cycle for RTL and compiler proposal

2021-04-18 Thread Zamrony P. Juhara via fpc-pascal
I would like to propose to separate RTL release   from compiler release so that RTL bug fixes and features can be released with shorter release cycle. Is that possible? Zamrony P. Juharahttps://github.com/zamronypj___ fpc-pascal maillist -