On 2014-07-27 13:28, Andreas Berger wrote:
I have noticed quit often here that instead of answering the question
people try to reason why in the world the author of the question would
even want to do this.
I agree that this is an annoying pattern on this list.
I would suggest everyone at least
Am 2014-07-27 19:28, schrieb Andreas Berger:
I have noticed quit often here that instead of answering the question people try to
reason why in the world the author of the question would even want to do this. Would it
not be better to tell him how to do it or at the most say "I don't know". I
I very seldom comment on this, or any, forum unless I have a good answer
and no one else seem to have one. This case is different. I have noticed
quit often here that instead of answering the question people try to
reason why in the world the author of the question would even want to do
this. W
Am 2014-07-27 12:51, schrieb Steve Gatenby:
I would find code in the form of
ArrayLen := IncLength(ArrayName, 1);
to be much more readable then
SetLength(ArrayName, Length(ArrayName)+1);
ArrayLen:= High(ArrayName);
Why? It is not clear which index ArrayLen will receive from IncLength.
Thanks for that - I will give it a try :)
On 27/07/14 21:21, leledumbo wrote:
It is only a personal preference, not a serious problem.
I would find code in the form of
ArrayLen := IncLength(ArrayName, 1);
to be much more readable then
SetLength(ArrayName, Length(ArrayName)+1);
> It is only a personal preference, not a serious problem.
>
> I would find code in the form of
>ArrayLen := IncLength(ArrayName, 1);
>
> to be much more readable then
>
> SetLength(ArrayName, Length(ArrayName)+1);
> ArrayLen:= High(ArrayName);
>
> I was just hoping somebody ma
It is only a personal preference, not a serious problem.
I would find code in the form of
ArrayLen := IncLength(ArrayName, 1);
to be much more readable then
SetLength(ArrayName, Length(ArrayName)+1);
ArrayLen:= High(ArrayName);
I was just hoping somebody may know how its done.
Thanks
Am 2014-07-27 12:10, schrieb Steve Gatenby:
> Could anybody enlighten me on how to make the 'SetLength' procedure into an
equivalent function
> I have many instances of
> SetLength(xxx, Length(xxx)+1);
> Num := High(xxx);
What is the problem with this code?
Why force these 2 commands into
Could anybody enlighten me on how to make the 'SetLength' procedure into
an equivalent function
I have many instances of
SetLength(xxx, Length(xxx)+1);
Num := High(xxx);
I would like to have Num := SetLength(xxx, Length(xxx)+1);
or even something like Num := IncLength(xxx, 1);
These are
