On Monday 24 October 2005 09:52 am, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> Maybe we can check it in in FPC's SubVersion under packages ?
> This way it can be used/tested by everyone.
contacted off list
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
htt
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Den Jean wrote:
Hi,
http://lists.freepascal.org/lists/fpc-pascal/2005-July/008764.html
still interested in a Qt4/binding ?
Yes.
Maybe we can check it in in FPC's SubVersion under packages ?
This way it can be used/tested by everyone.
Michael.
___
Hi,
http://lists.freepascal.org/lists/fpc-pascal/2005-July/008764.html
still interested in a Qt4/binding ?
I have created one, that contains enough of libQtGui
to start porting CLX to Qt4.
But I can always use help. Someone should create pascal
Qt4 programs to verify the binding.
In the mean
Thank you Den.
I'll do some homework and keep you posted of my findings and progress.
Don't expect much progress in the next 3 weeks, I'm on holiday :)
Regards,
Alain
Le 22 juil. 05, à 00:24, Den Jean a écrit :
On Thursday 21 July 2005 06:53 pm, Alain Vitry wrote:
Den,
Could you point me to
On Thursday 21 July 2005 06:53 pm, Alain Vitry wrote:
> Den,
> Could you point me to some reading/starting point on how to make those
> bindings ?
> Swig doesn't support pascal yet.
> I have a fresh QT4 bindings for pascal in mind.
> Thanks
There are several ways:
kalyptus: see cvs/fpc/
Den,
Could you point me to some reading/starting point on how to make those
bindings ?
Swig doesn't support pascal yet.
I have a fresh QT4 bindings for pascal in mind.
Thanks
Le 21 juil. 05, à 18:46, Den Jean a écrit :
The binding is made in C/C++, one of the makefiles is 2730 lines.
So it
On Thursday 21 July 2005 05:21 pm, Matt Emson wrote:
> Excellent. I do have a Mandrake 8.1 and Mandrake 9.0 install CD hanging
> about. Are either of those preferable? I would also like to get it going
> under Windows.. just because I know I'll be in Windows for more frequently.
> Was there a spec
> The fpc qte binding demo program shows that it is usable.
> If however you have problems and think it is binding or fpc
> related, I am always willing to investigate this.
> I just did so for someone who had a problem with QLCDNumber,
> it probably is a small fpc bug concerning passing a double p
On 21 Jul 2005, at 16:57, Marc Perkel wrote:
How do I get off this list? I'd like to turn it off for now.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Go to the above url, enter
Marc Perkel wrote:
How do I get off this list? I'd like to turn it off for now.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Take a look at the URL posted at the bottom of this m
Never mind - i figured it out - duh I'm such and idiot!
Marc Perkel wrote:
How do I get off this list? I'd like to turn it off for now.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-
How do I get off this list? I'd like to turn it off for now.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Thursday 21 July 2005 04:22 pm, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> > I realise this is slightly off
> > topic, but I remember the developer working on the bindings posted to this
> > list a while back.
> >
The fpc qte binding demo program shows that it is usable.
If however you have problems and think
Matt Emson wrote:
> Just laid my hands on a used Zaurus SL5500. I was wondering how stable the
> Zaurus cross compiler and QT wrapper were?
Should be very usable.
> I realise this is slightly off
> topic, but I remember the developer working on the bindings posted to this
> list a while back.
>
Just laid my hands on a used Zaurus SL5500. I was wondering how stable the
Zaurus cross compiler and QT wrapper were? I realise this is slightly off
topic, but I remember the developer working on the bindings posted to this
list a while back.
Any info?
TTFN,
Matt
__
15 matches
Mail list logo
