Sorry about breaking the thread.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Joao Morais wrote:
> Anyway I'd like to see some fixes in the rtl, not because of
> compatibility but because of performance improvement: not declaring
> refcounted parameters such as ansi strings and com interfaces will
> lead to
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 09 Mar 2013, at 02:37, Joao Morais wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Flávio Etrusco
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>
>> You are suggesting that this unlikely coincidente which causes a
>> sigsegv should be the programmer's respons
On 09 Mar 2013, at 02:37, Joao Morais wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Flávio Etrusco
> wrote:
>>
>>> procedure addintf(const aintf: IUnknown);
>>> (...)
>>>addintf(TInterfacedObject.Create);
>>> (...)
>>
>> It's a pity, but I don't know whether it's fixable (or if needs to be
>>
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Flávio Etrusco wrote:
>
>> procedure addintf(const aintf: IUnknown);
>> (...)
>> addintf(TInterfacedObject.Create);
>> (...)
>
> It's a pity, but I don't know whether it's fixable (or if needs to be
> "fixed") in the compiler.
Works in Delphi 7 with FastMM4.
>
>
> var
> vintfl: TInterfaceList;
>
BTW You should use a IInterfaceList variable
> procedure addintf(const aintf: IUnknown);
> (...)
> addintf(TInterfacedObject.Create);
> (...)
It's a pity, but I don't know whether it's fixable (or if needs to be
"fixed") in the compiler.
The TInterfacedO
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:27 AM, José Mejuto wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> AFAIK you are casting a IUnknown to iintf instead requesting the iintf
> interface. I think the right procedure should be:
>
> v1 := vintf[0] as iintf;
Hello, thanks for your reply.
You are right, changing to a safe typecast, don'
El 07/03/2013 12:29, Joao Morais escribió:
Hello list, what's the problem with "RoundThree" procedure (below)?
Here it raises a sigsegv trying to read an internal field. The
difference from "RoundTwo" is that I create an implementation of the
interface within the first param of tinterfacedlist.ad
Hello list, what's the problem with "RoundThree" procedure (below)?
Here it raises a sigsegv trying to read an internal field. The
difference from "RoundTwo" is that I create an implementation of the
interface within the first param of tinterfacedlist.add method.
Same problem with fpc 2.6.2 and 2.
