On 30 Sep 2011, at 18:27, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> This is probably my fault although:
> 1. delphi does not support such declarations
> 2. we don't have a test for this kind of syntax
>
> So maybe we had a feature by accident?
Set type is defined as "set of ordinal type":
http://www.freepascal.
30.09.2011 23:06, Jonas Maebe wrote:
old code working with 2.5.1 from June writes:
TYPE TByteSet = set of Byte(0)..Byte(7);
Fatal: Syntax error, ";" expected but "(" found
What has changed on syntax for this definition?
PS: I use {$MODE Delphi} switch.
I have updated my FPC to SVN from tod
On 30 Sep 2011, at 16:56, fred f wrote:
I have updated my FPC to SVN from today and when I try to compile my
old code working with 2.5.1 from June writes:
TYPE TByteSet = set of Byte(0)..Byte(7);
Fatal: Syntax error, ";" expected but "(" found
What has changed on syntax for this definition
Hi guys,
I have updated my FPC to SVN from today and when I try to compile my
old code working with 2.5.1 from June writes:
TYPE TByteSet = set of Byte(0)..Byte(7);
>> Fatal: Syntax error, ";" expected but "(" found
What has changed on syntax for this definition?
PS: I use {$MODE Delphi} switc
