On 30/08/18 12:00, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:57:21AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:> Ah yes, that's it, thanks very
much.> > WriteLn(StdErr, Format('# Socket %s, clock resolution %8.6f uSec',>
[socketName, ts.tv_nsec / 1000]));> ttextrec(StdErr).flushfunc:=
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:57:21AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Ah yes, that's it, thanks very much.
>
> WriteLn(StdErr, Format('# Socket %s, clock resolution %8.6f uSec',
> [socketName, ts.tv_nsec / 1000]));
> ttextrec(StdErr).flushfunc:= ttextrec(StdErr).inoutfunc;
> while
On 30/08/18 10:15, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:45:00AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:> On 30/08/18 09:00, Henry Vermaak wrote:> >On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at
07:52:54AM +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote:> > >In order to flush textfiles automatically I use> ">
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:45:00AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> On 30/08/18 09:00, Henry Vermaak wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:52:54AM +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote:
>
> >In order to flush textfiles automatically I use> ">
> >ttextrec().flushfunc:= ttextrec().inoutfunc;> "> after it
On 30/08/18 09:00, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:52:54AM +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote:
In order to flush textfiles automatically I use> "> ttextrec().flushfunc:=
ttextrec().inoutfunc;> "> after it is opened.
Reading text.inc this morning lead me to believe this is the
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:52:54AM +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 August 2018 17:01:54 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> > I think I've seen this question asked before, my apologies if this was
> > recently.
> >
> > I've got two programs intended to be functionally identical, one in
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 15:01 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> I've got two programs intended to be functionally identical, one in Perl
> and the other in FPC. They read a unix-domain datagram, decode the
> message, and emit output; if this goes to a file then it's reasonable to
> monitor it
On Wednesday 29 August 2018 17:01:54 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> I think I've seen this question asked before, my apologies if this was
> recently.
>
> I've got two programs intended to be functionally identical, one in Perl
> and the other in FPC. They read a unix-domain datagram, decode the
>
On 08/29/2018 11:49 AM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
Otherwise you'll have to Flush() them manually, which is a pain.
really? i wrote a wrapper for write and writeln that simply calls them and then
does a flush()... nothing painful other than using mywrite() and mywriteln() or
similar ;)
--
On 08/29/2018 11:01 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is there an equivalent for Pascal, or should I be using something like
fpSync(stdout) at opportune times?
flush();
i use it all the time on my programs that write to the logs... i hate having a
crash and be missing some log output because it
Am 29.08.2018 um 18:25 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
On 29/08/18 16:00, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 03:01:54PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:> I
think I've seen this question asked before, my apologies if this was>
recently.> > I've got two programs intended to be functionally
On 29/08/18 16:00, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 03:01:54PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:> I think I've seen this question asked before, my
apologies if this was> recently.> > I've got two programs intended to be functionally identical, one in Perl
and> the other in FPC. They
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 03:01:54PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> I think I've seen this question asked before, my apologies if this was
> recently.
>
> I've got two programs intended to be functionally identical, one in Perl and
> the other in FPC. They read a unix-domain datagram, decode the
I think I've seen this question asked before, my apologies if this was
recently.
I've got two programs intended to be functionally identical, one in Perl
and the other in FPC. They read a unix-domain datagram, decode the
message, and emit output; if this goes to a file then it's reasonable to
14 matches
Mail list logo
