On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 15:25:55 +0100
Maciej Izak wrote:
> 2017-11-16 15:21 GMT+01:00 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
> > I think that prefixedattributes should simply disable the use of proc
> > modifier []. The probability of having code that needs both is almost zero,
> > the [] syntax is very old and a
On 16.11.2017 20:25, Maciej Izak wrote:
>
>
> 2017-11-16 20:17 GMT+01:00 Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> mailto:fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>>:
>
> One other point to differentiate them: the modifier one always ends with
> a semicolon after the closing bracket, Delphi's attributes never d
2017-11-16 20:17 GMT+01:00 Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <
fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>:
> One other point to differentiate them: the modifier one always ends with
> a semicolon after the closing bracket, Delphi's attributes never do that.
>
sadly this is not true at all :(
see:
https://svn.fre
On 16.11.2017 14:12, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 16.11.2017 14:01 schrieb "Mattias Gaertner"
> mailto:nc-gaert...@netcologne.de>>:
>
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:49:59 +0100
> Maciej Izak mailto:hnb.c...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > 2017-11-16 11:39 GMT+01:00 Mattias Gaertner
> mailto:nc-gaert
On 16.11.2017 15:10, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:12:18 +0100
> Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> So, how will FPC distinguish the two []?
>>
>>
>> The only idea I have is to check whether the first identifier is a
>> attribute and if not handle it as a modifier (
2017-11-16 15:21 GMT+01:00 Michael Van Canneyt :
> I think that prefixedattributes should simply disable the use of proc
> modifier []. The probability of having code that needs both is almost zero,
> the [] syntax is very old and almost not used.
>
> Mode Delphi(Unicode) enables prefixedattribute
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:12:18 +0100
Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
[...]
So, how will FPC distinguish the two []?
The only idea I have is to check whether the first identifier is a
attribute and if not handle it as a modifier (or if a comma is
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:12:18 +0100
Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
>[...]
> So, how will FPC distinguish the two []?
>
>
> The only idea I have is to check whether the first identifier is a
> attribute and if not handle it as a modifier (or if a comma is following
> the first identifier).
ppa
2017-11-16 14:01 GMT+01:00 Mattias Gaertner :
> Good to know. Thanks.
>
> So, how will FPC distinguish the two []?
for now the idea is very simple: for active prefixedattributes "procedure
modifier []" will be inaccessible (which means breaking for backward
compatibility). This is the reason why
Am 16.11.2017 14:01 schrieb "Mattias Gaertner" :
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:49:59 +0100
Maciej Izak wrote:
> 2017-11-16 11:39 GMT+01:00 Mattias Gaertner :
>
> > What $modes support this?
> > The reason I ask is I'm trying to distinguish them from Delphi
> > Attributes in pparser.
> >
>
> for Delphi
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:49:59 +0100
Maciej Izak wrote:
> 2017-11-16 11:39 GMT+01:00 Mattias Gaertner :
>
> > What $modes support this?
> > The reason I ask is I'm trying to distinguish them from Delphi
> > Attributes in pparser.
> >
>
> for Delphi like attributes FPC will have new modeswitch "
2017-11-16 11:39 GMT+01:00 Mattias Gaertner :
> What $modes support this?
> The reason I ask is I'm trying to distinguish them from Delphi
> Attributes in pparser.
>
for Delphi like attributes FPC will have new modeswitch "prefixedattributes" .
The implicit usage for $prefixedattributes in DELPH
Hi,
Where can I find some information about the [] procedure modifier of
FPC?
For example:
procedure fpc_check_object(_vmt : pointer);
[public,alias:'FPC_CHECK_OBJECT']; compilerproc;
What $modes support this?
The reason I ask is I'm trying to distinguish them from Delphi
Attributes in pparser.
13 matches
Mail list logo
