On 05/08/2017 04:49 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2017 09:22:48 +0100
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-05-08 04:26, nore...@z505.com wrote:
which is like a variable, but called a const ;-)
I'm slowly but surely loosing all hope for Object Pascal.
Am 2017-05-08 um 12:31 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
This is not something invented by FPC.
It is something inherited from Turbo Pascal.
And Delphi up to D4 iirc.
Delphi inherited it from Turbo Pascal.
Actually, it was a hack.
Const defines end
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
>
> This is not something invented by FPC.
> It is something inherited from Turbo Pascal.
And Delphi up to D4 iirc.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On Mon, 8 May 2017, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-05-08 09:49, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Was a typed const ever read only?
And does CONSTANT in any other language mean writable? I think
they have VAR for that. Maybe it's just the terminology used
in FPC.
This is not something invented
On 08/05/17 08:30, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-05-08 04:26, nore...@z505.com wrote:> which is like a variable, but
called a const ;-)
I'm slowly but surely loosing all hope for Object Pascal. The languageis
becoming more and more mangled with every new release ofDelphi and FPC.
I'm not
On 2017-05-08 09:49, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Was a typed const ever read only?
And does CONSTANT in any other language mean writable? I think
they have VAR for that. Maybe it's just the terminology used
in FPC.
Regards,
Graeme
___
fpc-pascal
On Mon, 8 May 2017, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2017 09:22:48 +0100
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-05-08 04:26, nore...@z505.com wrote:
> which is like a variable, but called a const ;-)
I'm slowly but surely loosing all hope for Object Pascal.
On Mon, 8 May 2017 09:22:48 +0100
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2017-05-08 04:26, nore...@z505.com wrote:
> > which is like a variable, but called a const ;-)
>
> I'm slowly but surely loosing all hope for Object Pascal. The language
> is becoming more and more
On 2017-05-08 04:26, nore...@z505.com wrote:
> which is like a variable, but called a const ;-)
I'm slowly but surely loosing all hope for Object Pascal. The language
is becoming more and more mangled with every new release of
Delphi and FPC.
Regards,
Graeme
On 2017-05-03 06:49, Peter wrote:
On 03/05/17 00:53, Marc Santhoff wrote:
Hi,
for playing around I would need a grammar of Object Pascal. I do not
care for which tool it is written or at best if it is plain EBNF.
Does such grammar exist?
TIA,
Marc
I found grammar for Delphi once.
Trying
On 2017-05-03 04:37, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 3 May 2017, denisgolovan wrote:
On 2017-05-03 00:53, Marc Santhoff wrote:
Does such grammar exist?
Well, it depends on what you are trying to solve.
If you want to parse Pascal using FPC - that's one way. If you want to
get some king
On 2017-05-02 18:53, Marc Santhoff wrote:
Hi,
for playing around I would need a grammar of Object Pascal. I do not
care for which tool it is written or at best if it is plain EBNF.
Does such grammar exist?
The issue is that there is no object pascal, or in other words, there's
about 5
In our previous episode, Marco van de Voort said:
> > Does such grammar exist?
>
> Not within FPC/Lazarus project, since those use handcrafted recursive
> descent parsers. So that means websearch, and then your search is as good as
> mine.
>
> The manual of older Delphi versions had a grammar
On 03/05/17 00:53, Marc Santhoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for playing around I would need a grammar of Object Pascal. I do not
> care for which tool it is written or at best if it is plain EBNF.
>
> Does such grammar exist?
>
> TIA,
> Marc
>
>
> ___
>
On Wed, 3 May 2017, denisgolovan wrote:
On 2017-05-03 00:53, Marc Santhoff wrote:
Does such grammar exist?
Well, it depends on what you are trying to solve.
If you want to parse Pascal using FPC - that's one way.
If you want to get some king of AST using any available [command-line]
> On 2017-05-03 00:53, Marc Santhoff wrote:
>> Does such grammar exist?
Well, it depends on what you are trying to solve.
If you want to parse Pascal using FPC - that's one way.
If you want to get some king of AST using any available [command-line] tools -
that's another one.
Talking about
On 2017-05-03 00:53, Marc Santhoff wrote:
> Does such grammar exist?
Not as part of the Free Pascal project. At one stage I have been
maintaining my own Pascal Grammar in EBNF format as part of the
documentation for fpGUI, but I haven’t kept up with all the recent FPC
syntax changes though - no
In our previous episode, Marc Santhoff said:
> for playing around I would need a grammar of Object Pascal. I do not
> care for which tool it is written or at best if it is plain EBNF.
>
> Does such grammar exist?
Not within FPC/Lazarus project, since those use handcrafted recursive
descent
Hi,
for playing around I would need a grammar of Object Pascal. I do not
care for which tool it is written or at best if it is plain EBNF.
Does such grammar exist?
TIA,
Marc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
19 matches
Mail list logo