On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 23.58, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
So this makes your case, doesn't it. Martin argued that his dataset was
designed to work together with his visual controls.
Yes, but it's an important part, because exactly this is
Hi all,
To see what the differences in speed are between MSEdb and fcl-db I did
some benchmarks. (See the attachment for the code and results)
I think that the first conclusion is that when it comes to executing
queries, opening connections to the database and such, the 'real sql-
work' there's
On Monday 16 July 2007 14.20, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Hi all,
To see what the differences in speed are between MSEdb and fcl-db I did
some benchmarks. (See the attachment for the code and results)
[...]
I tried to explain the readdata-difference. At first I thought that
msedb converted
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to explain the readdata-difference. At first I thought that
msedb converted all strings from string to widestring to string. But it
doesn't do that. (see my mails on this subject)
I think that the only reasonable
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Monday 16 July 2007 14.20, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Hi all,
To see what the differences in speed are between MSEdb and fcl-db I did
some benchmarks. (See the attachment for the code and results)
[...]
I tried to explain the
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:40 +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Monday 16 July 2007 14.20, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Hi all,
To see what the differences in speed are between MSEdb and fcl-db I did
some benchmarks. (See the attachment for the code and results)
[...]
I tried to
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 10:41 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to explain the readdata-difference. At first I thought that
msedb converted all strings from string to widestring to string. But it
doesn't do that. (see
Joost van der Sluis schreef:
If you know a way to measure that using linux? It should be possible,
the shootout ppl also do this.
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/faq.php#memory
Maybe you can poll /proc/$PID/status
Vincent
___
fpc-pascal
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Joost van der Sluis schreef:
If you know a way to measure that using linux? It should be possible,
the shootout ppl also do this.
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/faq.php#memory
Maybe you can poll /proc/$PID/status
Why not simply
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:58 +0200, Coco Pascal wrote:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked?
To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing
relevance more and more.
Offcourse, but it has some usefull
Op Tue, 17 Jul 2007, schreef Coco Pascal:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked?
To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing relevance
more and more.
I'm interested in responsiveness in n-tier
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Tue, 17 Jul 2007, schreef Coco Pascal:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked?
To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing relevance
more and more.
I'm interested in
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:58 +0200, Coco Pascal wrote:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked?
To me it seems that benchmark tests on 10 records are missing
relevance more and more.
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:27 +0200, Coco Pascal wrote:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:58 +0200, Coco Pascal wrote:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Discussion: What tests could I do more? Is there something I overlooked?
To me it seems that benchmark tests on
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 23.58, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
So this makes your case, doesn't it. Martin argued that his dataset was
designed to work together with his visual controls.
Yes, but it's an important part, because exactly this is the part that
has changed. Except from this and the
15 matches
Mail list logo
