> >
> > where by the time ThisSize is accessed any disparity has been
> > corrected?
> >
>
> Not sure if this will be of any use.
>
> but you can always define an assignment incompatible type
> WordLE = record data: Word; end;
>
> and define all required overloaded operators
Or an endian
Sven Barth wrote:
Am 09.03.2012 23:26, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
Martin wrote:
On 09/03/2012 21:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
but is there any way to define something like an
endianness-correcting type, i.e.:
Type TAWSHeader=Record
ThisSize: WordLE;
..
where by the time ThisSize is accessed
Am 09.03.2012 23:26, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
Martin wrote:
On 09/03/2012 21:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
but is there any way to define something like an
endianness-correcting type, i.e.:
Type TAWSHeader=Record
ThisSize: WordLE;
..
where by the time ThisSize is accessed any disparity has
Martin wrote:
On 09/03/2012 21:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
but is there any way to define something like an endianness-correcting
type, i.e.:
Type TAWSHeader=Record
ThisSize: WordLE;
..
where by the time ThisSize is accessed any disparity has been corrected?
Not sure if this will
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 09 Mar 2012, at 22:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Thanks Jonas, I don't think I need to do it but I thought it was a fair
question: better safe than sorry.
OK, so hopefully I can get away with another. I'm looking at a program written
in Delphi, which reads a file contain
On 09/03/2012 21:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
but is there any way to define something like an endianness-correcting
type, i.e.:
Type TAWSHeader=Record
ThisSize: WordLE;
..
where by the time ThisSize is accessed any disparity has been corrected?
Not sure if this will be of any use.
On 09 Mar 2012, at 22:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Thanks Jonas, I don't think I need to do it but I thought it was a fair
> question: better safe than sorry.
>
> OK, so hopefully I can get away with another. I'm looking at a program
> written in Delphi, which reads a file containing the ima
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 09 Mar 2012, at 21:38, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Can an Advanced Record, i.e. a record which as well as having fields has at
least one embedded function, be safely used as a cast or type transfer
overlaying unstructured bytes?
Yes.
Thanks Jonas, I don't think I need t
On 09 Mar 2012, at 21:38, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Can an Advanced Record, i.e. a record which as well as having fields has at
> least one embedded function, be safely used as a cast or type transfer
> overlaying unstructured bytes?
Yes.
Jonas___
