sday, August 30, 2017 2:51 PM
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Agg Pas Arcs
Hi James,
On 2017-08-30 17:10, James Richters wrote:
>>From the above, it seems you implemented your own Arc() procedure. Is that
>>correct?
> No, it's the Agg2D Arc Functio
Hi James,
On 2017-08-30 17:10, James Richters wrote:
From the above, it seems you implemented your own Arc() procedure. Is that
correct?
No, it's the Agg2D Arc Function:
http://www.crossgl.com/aggpas/documentation/#Arc
Could you try using my version of AggPas and see how that goes for you.
On 2017-08-30 17:10, James Richters wrote:
I think maybe email wrapping distorted my arc command so they didn't look right
Here is the command I am sending broken down with comments:
agg^.arc(
(Drawinfo.gi*pixelscale+Draw_X_offset), {Cx}
(Drawinfo.gj*pixelscale+Draw_Y_offset), {Cy}
On 2017-08-30 17:43, James Richters wrote:
I can supply a complete sample program if it would help
See Sample Program Attached
Thank you, that should really help a lot is solving the issue. I'll take
a look later tonight or tomorrow morning.
Regards,
Graeme
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a
lt;fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Agg Pas Arcs
Also I just do all my math in radians so I don’t' need to convert deg2rad() as
in the examples. There is little point in converting everything to degrees
just to convert it back to radians again.
James
-Origina
] On Behalf Of
James Richters
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 12:10 PM
To: 'FPC-Pascal users discussions' <fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Agg Pas Arcs
>From the above, it seems you implemented your own Arc() procedure. Is that
>correct?
No, it's the Agg2D
>From the above, it seems you implemented your own Arc() procedure. Is that
>correct?
No, it's the Agg2D Arc Function:
http://www.crossgl.com/aggpas/documentation/#Arc
>Could you try using my version of AggPas and see how that goes for you.
Yes I am using your version already
>If there is a
