Hello FPC-Pascal,
Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 8:25:07 PM, you wrote:
MG IMO it is simply good manner to ask Tim.
MG He spent quite some time in testing and tuning and explained the
MG algorithm in detail, so I guess he will be happy to see his fame
MG spreading.
Do you know the email address of Tim
Hello FPC-Pascal,
Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 1:06:43 PM, you wrote:
Why is TimSort specially interesting to you ?
MG I need a fast stable sort, so multiple sorts work as expected (contrary to
MG QuickSort).
MG TimSort is a candidate.
That's exactly the answer I was looking for, the stability
José Mejuto joshy...@gmail.com hat am 24. Mai 2011 um 18:07 geschrieben:
Hello FPC-Pascal,
Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 1:06:43 PM, you wrote:
Why is TimSort specially interesting to you ?
MG I need a fast stable sort, so multiple sorts work as expected (contrary
to
MG
2011/5/24 José Mejuto joshy...@gmail.com:
Hello FPC-Pascal,
Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 1:06:43 PM, you wrote:
Why is TimSort specially interesting to you ?
MG I need a fast stable sort, so multiple sorts work as expected (contrary
to
MG QuickSort).
MG TimSort is a candidate.
That's
Hello FPC-Pascal,
Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 8:25:07 PM, you wrote:
MG If you do only the insertion+mergesort, then you have only implemented
MG a long known improved mergesort variant and you can not call it
MG TimSort. Of course then you don't need to ask Tim for permission.
Well, in first try
