[fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-16 Thread Jose Pascual
Hi there, Is there some 2.0 fpc release for cygwin? If no, How can I build it starting from the scratch? tia! best regards ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-16 Thread Peter Vreman
> Hi there, > > Is there some 2.0 fpc release for cygwin? > If no, How can I build it starting from the scratch? There is no release. If you want to start a cygwin special the best way is to start with a unix target and adapt it for cygwin. Things like opening files etc. all need to be done throug

Re: [fpc-pascal] Writeln in embedded systems

2005-08-16 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 15 aug 2005, at 15:06, Carsten Bager wrote: I have been experimenting with compiling to an embedded ARM platform I succeeded in compiling with a minimum system unit. Now the ARM processor can blink with a LED. I then tried to put in a Writeln just to se what library modules there was missing

[fpc-pascal] Linking Pascal code to C/C++ static libraries under Windows.

2005-08-16 Thread Lowell C. Savage
Background: I have an old DOS console program that I'm trying to resurrect to run on Windows XP. There isn't much about the structure of the program that I need (or want) to change. But the interfaces to hardware will have to change. It uses the old "PORT" array to communicate to the Serial

Re: [fpc-pascal] Linking Pascal code to C/C++ static libraries under Windows.

2005-08-16 Thread Marco van de Voort
> > The Problem: > > The problem is that I can't seem to figure out how to get FPC to link to > static libraries. FPC's linker won't look for the "Wrapper.lib". It > either wants "Wrapper.dll" or "Wrapper.lib.dll". I can compile wrapper.c > to an object module (in Visual C 6.0) and FPC will

RE: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-16 Thread Jose Pascual
Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc? Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc 1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version? > > Hi there, > > > > Is there some 2.0 fpc release for cygwin? > > If no, How can I build it starting from the scratch? >

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-16 Thread Vincent Snijders
Jose Pascual wrote: Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc? Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc 1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version? IIRC, fpc 1.0.0 can be made with turbo pascal 7. Vincent. __

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-16 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 16 aug 2005, at 20:24, Jose Pascual wrote: Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc? No. Jonas ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-16 Thread Matt Emson
> Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc? > Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc > 1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version? Cygwin runs exclusively on Windows machines... FPC has a Windows port. Whilst I can see the point of a port to Cygwin,

RE: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-16 Thread Jose Pascual
Okey, but I think that the first stage for make fpc is to compiling some asm or c files using binutils, right? so in cygwin I have binutils, even gcc, how I shoud to do to create first fpc from ASMs or Cs files? > > On 16 aug 2005, at 20:24, Jose Pascual wrote: > > > Is there some posibility t

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-16 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 16 aug 2005, at 21:44, Jose Pascual wrote: Okey, but I think that the first stage for make fpc is to compiling some asm or c files using binutils, right? No, FPC is entirely written in Pascal (just like gcc is written in C and not in assembler). The original bootstrap was with Turbo Pasc

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-16 Thread Marco van de Voort
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Jose Pascual wrote: > > Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc? > > Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc > > 1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version? > > IIRC, fpc 1.0.0 can be made with tur

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-16 Thread Marco van de Voort
> Okey, > but I think that the first stage for make fpc is to compiling some asm > or c files using binutils, right? Incorrect. > so in cygwin I have binutils, even gcc, how I shoud to do to create > first fpc from ASMs or Cs files? You can't, FPC is written in pascal. ___

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-16 Thread L505
> By the way, how would one compile Pascal code without a Pascal compiler? No > magic script file will avoid the need for fpc. I asked this question on C2 wiki once.. I guess you could start by hardcoding a binary program from scratch in a text editor with your bare hands. Then you have the meani

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-16 Thread L505
> No, FPC is entirely written in Pascal (just like gcc is written in C > and not in assembler). The original bootstrap was with Turbo Pascal, > but TP compatibility has been dropped a long time ago. It must be > bootstrapped with itself now. Neato.. offtopic but if anyone wondered, the delphi com

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-16 Thread Nikolay Nikolov
L505 wrote: Neato.. offtopic but if anyone wondered, the delphi compiler is originated from borland C++ as far as my tools told me. Yes, actually DCC32 is written in C++. Only the Delphi IDE is written in Delphi. FPC and Lazarus are both written in FPC :) __

[fpc-pascal] FPC in Dr Dobbs.

2005-08-16 Thread Marco van de Voort
Dr Dobbs august edition has a small note about FPC 2.0.0 release :-) ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal