Marco van de Voort a écrit :
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Thank you for your prompt answer.
I tried to set the dynamic linker whith the -FL option too, but it
Hello!
I tried to compile the daily snapshot from source and got the following
during compilation:
make.EXE[3]: Entering directory `D:/FreePascal/sources/fpc/compiler'
process_begin: CreateProcess((null), echo Start 12:42:49 now 12:43:09, ...)
failed.
make (e=2): The system cannot find the file
Hello!
You (Florian Klaempfl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote about Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows 64 bit on 07/27/2006 at 10:17:
I downloaded 64-bit toolset in April (afair). Is there any new version
available?
FK No, but building them from source is no problem.
I have compiled the daily snapshot
At 12:12 31-7-2006, you wrote:
Hello!
I tried to compile the daily snapshot from source and got the following
during compilation:
make.EXE[3]: Entering directory `D:/FreePascal/sources/fpc/compiler'
process_begin: CreateProcess((null), echo Start 12:42:49 now 12:43:09, ...)
failed.
make (e=2):
At 13:17 31-7-2006, you wrote:
Hello!
You (Florian Klaempfl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote about Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows 64 bit on 07/27/2006 at 10:17:
I downloaded 64-bit toolset in April (afair). Is there any new version
available?
FK No, but building them from source is no problem.
I
Hello!
You (Peter Vreman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
about Re: [fpc-pascal] Minor issue compiling FPC from sources on
07/31/2006 at 15:02:
PV gecho.exe is delivered FPC.
PV Make sure you only use the make.exe and the tools delivered with FPC
PV from CMD.EXE. Other combinations are not
At 14:17 31-7-2006, you wrote:
Hello!
You (Peter Vreman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
about Re: [fpc-pascal] Minor issue compiling FPC from sources on
07/31/2006 at 15:02:
PV gecho.exe is delivered FPC.
PV Make sure you only use the make.exe and the tools delivered with FPC
PV from CMD.EXE.
Hello!
You (Peter Vreman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
about Re: Windows 64 bit [fpc-pascal] on 07/31/2006 at 15:05:
PV make CPU_TARGET=x86_64 OS_TARGET=win64 build install
PREFIX=win64installpath
Thank you for the tip.
When I use those settings, I get the 64-bit toolset. What I wanted is
Hello!
You (Peter Vreman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
about Re: Minor issue compiling FPC from sources [fpc-pascal] on
07/31/2006 at 15:26:
PV That shouldn't matter that line is there already for years and is
PV known to work on all Windows versions even dating back to WIn95 and
PV upto
At 14:35 31-7-2006, you wrote:
Hello!
You (Peter Vreman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
about Re: Windows 64 bit [fpc-pascal] on 07/31/2006 at 15:05:
PV make CPU_TARGET=x86_64 OS_TARGET=win64 build install
PREFIX=win64installpath
Thank you for the tip.
When I use those settings, I get the
First, is this the best list to discuss this?
I've got rather agressive filtering in my mailing list gateway. If anybody tries
to send any attachments etc. to me please use markMLl.fpc2 .AT. telemetry .DOT.
co .DOT. uk.
I admit readily to being a beginner as far as FPC is concerned, and
At 17:06 31-7-2006, you wrote:
First, is this the best list to discuss this?
I've got rather agressive filtering in my mailing list gateway. If
anybody tries
to send any attachments etc. to me please use markMLl.fpc2 .AT.
telemetry .DOT.
co .DOT. uk.
I admit readily to being a beginner as
Peter Vreman wrote:
At 17:06 31-7-2006, you wrote:
First, is this the best list to discuss this?
Yes for basic questions like how to do this or that. When discussing
more complex stuff like is this the right way for fixing problem XYZ
which popped up on SPARC, or attached diff should fix problem
Peter Vreman wrote:
* Are there further validation tests available?
There is a testsuite available in SVN (or fpc.zip) under fpc/trunk/tests
Thanks. Got fpc/tests from the source which I presume is what you're referring
to.
* How can I build an installation bundle to move to a virgin
Hi,
when compiling without -B we get internal errors like 200110203 and 200306067
is more info as below required ?
200110203 :
...
mseclasses.pas(2122,7) Warning: Class types tmsecomponent and
TComponentcracker are not related
mseclasses.pas(2320,2) Note: Local variable ca1 not used
15 matches
Mail list logo