Just for fun I wanted to see what people thought about a potential "pair" type
added to the compiler. Dictionaries have proven themselves to be a fundamental
type we use often and they are appearing as built-in syntax in many languages,
especially scripting languages that allow dynamic object
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mi., 16. Dez. 2020, 18:38:
> Just for fun I wanted to see what people thought about a potential "pair"
> type added to the compiler. Dictionaries have proven themselves to be a
> fundamental type we use often and they are appearing as built-in syntax in
>
> On Dec 16, 2020, at 10:50 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> This can simply be done using existing language constructs, no need to
> introduce anything new.
>
That's what I thought you'd say. ;) It's basically syntactic sugar surrounding
a generic record, so yes technically it is. It's just
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mi., 16. Dez. 2020, 19:41:
>
>
> > On Dec 16, 2020, at 10:50 AM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > This can simply be done using existing language constructs, no need to
> introduce anything new.
> >
>
> That's what I thought you'd say. ;) It's basically
Hello,
this compiles under FPC 3.0.4
const
s: AnsiString = 'abc';
p: pointer = @s[1];
but not under FPC 3.2.0
(I checked old Delphi XE and there it does not compile also)
Is it regression bug or not?
-Laco.
Thank you, yes it works. I have used:
const
MyConst1: AnsiString =
