On Wed, 24 May 2023, Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal wrote:
On May 21, 2023, at 11:03 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
wrote:
They're used all over the place in the RTL and FCL, so you better take them
into account.
The compiler will do this wrapping anyway if you use ansistrings,
> On May 21, 2023, at 11:03 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> They're used all over the place in the RTL and FCL, so you better take them
> into account.
>
> The compiler will do this wrapping anyway if you use ansistrings, so the
> approach with e.g. a generic record will
Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mi., 24. Mai 2023, 14:10:
> You must have $H+ on and those are AnsiStrings? Why is there exception
> handling involved with AnsiString? I guess it needs this just in case an
> exception is thrown somewhere in the call stack?
Because Ansi- and
On 23-5-2023 12:44, Benito van der Zander via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hi,
Depends on your code.
I wrote all my code in Delphi 4. From 1998 or so. I do not make new
projects, only maintain old ones.
Delphi 4 felt much better.
Like take:
procedure test;
var s: string;
begin
s:= 'abc';
end;
Hi,
It is weird that your code calls setjmp? Are you using a non Windows
platform? Comparisons with Delphi should be done on Windows where the
exception systems match. Apples to Apples please.
It is FPC on Linux.
And Delphi 4 on Linux (in WINE)
Even if it wants to do the Linux nonsense,
Benito van der Zander via fpc-pascal
schrieb am Mi., 24. Mai 2023, 13:00:
> Hi,
>
> It is weird that your code calls setjmp? Are you using a non Windows
> platform? Comparisons with Delphi should be done on Windows where the
> exception systems match. Apples to Apples please.
>
>
> It is FPC on
You must have $H+ on and those are AnsiStrings? Why is there exception handling
involved with AnsiString? I guess it needs this just in case an exception is
thrown somewhere in the call stack?
> On May 23, 2023, at 5:44 PM, Benito van der Zander via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> Like take:
>
>
On 24-5-2023 13:00, Benito van der Zander via fpc-pascal wrote:
It is weird that your code calls setjmp? Are you using a non Windows
platform? Comparisons with Delphi should be done on Windows where
the exception systems match. Apples to Apples please.
It is FPC on Linux.
And Delphi 4 on
> On May 24, 2023, at 8:46 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> I see no problem, I am used to this.
>
> This is Pascal, you need to manage your memory and hence your references,
> this is true even in the absence of exceptions: In your example you would
> also need to
Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Do., 25. Mai 2023, 04:26:
>
>
> > On May 24, 2023, at 10:11 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> >
> > You must have $H+ on and those are AnsiStrings? Why is there exception
> handling involved with AnsiString? I guess
> On May 24, 2023, at 10:11 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> You must have $H+ on and those are AnsiStrings? Why is there exception
> handling involved with AnsiString? I guess it needs this just in case an
> exception is thrown somewhere in the call stack?
>
> Because Ansi- and
On Thu, 25 May 2023, Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal wrote:
On May 24, 2023, at 10:11 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
wrote:
You must have $H+ on and those are AnsiStrings? Why is there exception handling
involved with AnsiString? I guess it needs this just in case an exception is
thrown
Benito van der Zander via fpc-pascal
schrieb am Do., 25. Mai 2023, 00:15:
> Hi
>
>
> Then also run FPC/win32 in wine for a real comparison.
>
>
> Or perhaps against modern C++ on Linux would also be a real comparison
>
It wouldn't be, because that would compare two different languages. C++
Hi
Then also run FPC/win32 in wine for a real comparison.
Or perhaps against modern C++ on Linux would also be a real comparison
FPC could at least inline fpc_setjmp in fpc_pushexceptaddr to make it
only one function call.
These kinds of statements are counter-productive.
That is a
14 matches
Mail list logo
