Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus + Qt4 in FreeBSD

2007-12-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm interested, but I don't know the correct steps to do the libqt4intf... I do: 1) Copy Qt4 sources to my home directory; 2) Build Qt4; 3) Copy the compile_lib.bash to compile_lib_fbsd.sh and change it to use my Qt4 (in my home directory) 4) Run compile_libfbsd.sh 5) Put the libqt4intf.so in

Re: [fpc-pascal] Lazarus + Qt4 in FreeBSD

2007-12-02 Thread Den Jean
On Saturday 01 December 2007 12:28:21 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 6) Rebuild Lazarus without sucess... :( in point 5 you succesfully got a libqt4intf.so ?. Great. So the rest is just compiling lazarus. cd lazarus make LCL_PLATFORM=qt clean all OPT=dUSE_QT_4_3 and look at output The option

[fpc-pascal] Re: Help getting started with FPC

2007-12-02 Thread Ingemar Ragnemalm
Edward Kearns wrote: First of all, note that LWP 0.2.9's demo is TransSkel.p, not NewSkel.p, as in the Lightweight Pascal IDE notes. Yes, that was my fault. I only included the newest demos, but NewSkel.p should have been included all the same, since it is the example demo. TransSkel is

[fpc-pascal] (no subject)

2007-12-02 Thread Edward Kearns
Then when I do compile, and see nothing happen, the about box says: Lightweight IDE: 0.2.9 FPC (Intel): Failed! FPC (PPC): 2.2.0 GCC: powerpc-apple-Darwin8-gcc-4.0.1(GCC) TransSkel: 4.0a1 Looks perfect! (As long as you don't need to compile for Intel.) /Ingemar That's fine, but I

[fpc-pascal] can we have fpc's doc in chm format?

2007-12-02 Thread Bisma Jayadi
Can we have fpc's doc in chm format? It's easier to navigate and search compare to other formats. :) -Bee- has Bee.ography at: http://beeography.wordpress.com ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org

Re: [fpc-pascal] can we have fpc's doc in chm format?

2007-12-02 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Bisma Jayadi wrote: Can we have fpc's doc in chm format? It's easier to navigate and search compare to other formats. :) The reference material: If you complete the chm backend of fpdoc, yes. The manuals: definitely out. But I don't see how CHM is better than PDF. PDF

Re: [fpc-pascal] can we have fpc's doc in chm format?

2007-12-02 Thread Bisma Jayadi
The reference material: If you complete the chm backend of fpdoc, yes. The manuals: definitely out. Actually, the HTML is all fine. I just don't like to always back and forth between TOC and the content due its single page nature. It'd be better if the layout is change to 2 page/frame. Left

Re: [fpc-pascal] can we have fpc's doc in chm format?

2007-12-02 Thread Vincent Snijders
Michael Van Canneyt schreef: On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Bisma Jayadi wrote: Can we have fpc's doc in chm format? It's easier to navigate and search compare to other formats. :) The reference material: If you complete the chm backend of fpdoc, yes. The manuals: definitely out. I once made a chm

[fpc-pascal] DOM stumbles upon DOCTYPE

2007-12-02 Thread Marc Santhoff
Hi, I'm trying to use the unit located inn fpc-2.0.4/fcl/xml/dom.pp to parse files starting like this (shortened): ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? !DOCTYPE office:document-meta PUBLIC -//OpenOffice.org//DTD OfficeDocument ... office:document-meta

Re: [fpc-pascal] DOM stumbles upon DOCTYPE

2007-12-02 Thread Marco van de Voort
I'm trying to use the unit located inn fpc-2.0.4/fcl/xml/dom.pp to parse files starting like this (shortened): ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? !DOCTYPE office:document-meta PUBLIC -//OpenOffice.org//DTD OfficeDocument ... office:document-meta

Re: [fpc-pascal] DOM stumbles upon DOCTYPE

2007-12-02 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Sonntag, den 02.12.2007, 21:18 +0100 schrieb Marco van de Voort: I'm trying to use the unit located inn fpc-2.0.4/fcl/xml/dom.pp to parse files starting like this (shortened): ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? !DOCTYPE office:document-meta PUBLIC -//OpenOffice.org//DTD