Re: [fpc-pascal] locale solution for unix systems

2009-04-01 Thread Bart
A plugin is the more logical route, for the ones that want to remain libc free, but want to risk maintainance problems. Like an fplocale unit, that users can include if they do not want to use clocale? Yes, I don't see a problem with that, if the quality is suitable. (read:

[fpc-pascal] TList: newbie question

2009-04-01 Thread Bart
Hi, I never used TList before, so I'm not sure if this is correct. I constructed a TlcTextCache class that basically stores objects of type TLcText in a TList. A TlcText object is create with TLcText.Create(FileName). My questions: - I add my TlcText objects to the list by

[fpc-pascal] oCRT and ncurses in openSuSE 11.0 (32-Bit)

2009-04-01 Thread Rainer Hantsch
Hello, I wanted to port an old program from fpc 1.0.4 (SuSE 7.0) - fpc 2.0.4 (openSuSE 11.0, 32-bit). My program uses ken wright's oCRT, and I have a version which was extended by ken wright personally with some additional functions. It was very surprising that I could compile the main part of

[fpc-pascal] Re: modifying system.pp's InstallSignals

2009-04-01 Thread Seth Grover
Marco van de Voort wrote: It is roughly ok. Optionally you can also -dFPC_USE_LIBC to force the system unit to use libc instead of syscalls, and save a few kb. Note that this is less frequently tested though. I wasn't aware of that, and that would actually get me a lot closer to what I'm

Re: [fpc-pascal] TList: newbie question

2009-04-01 Thread Paul Nicholls
- Original Message - From: Bart bartjun...@gmail.com To: FPC-Pascal users discussions fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 10:12 PM Subject: [fpc-pascal] TList: newbie question Hi, I never used TList before, so I'm not sure if this is correct. I