On 03 Apr 2009, at 02:34, Markus Glugla wrote:
I need the available memory (heap). At that time the functions
maxavail
or memavail did this. I read that I should use GetFPCHeapStatus and
other function currently.
This functions produce allways zero!! What can I do? What is wrong?
I use fpc
Found some things on the net about Delphi and XMI, wouldn't be hard to create
FPC equivalent. Something named Bold from BoldSoft (or ECO or whatever).
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Generating-code-form-xmi-files-tp22848439p22864324.html
Sent from the Free Pascal -
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Philippe Martinole
philippe.martin...@teleauto.org wrote:
xmi files (not xml) are used to save uml models :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML_Metadata_Interchange
and I want to gererate my data structures from my uml diagrams
I would be suprised if nothing
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Philippe Martinole
philippe.martin...@teleauto.org wrote:
xmi files (not xml) are used to save uml models :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML_Metadata_Interchange
and I want to gererate my data structures
What is it meant by: no need to call [create] directly? How do you
invoke the constructor without calling it? ... and ... Why is create
not virtual and the destroy destructor is?
Often in other OOP language, you need to call parent constructor before
doing anything else. In OP case, you
On 03 Apr 2009, at 03:43, Richard Ward wrote:
C) Just out of curiosity, am wondering why FreeAndNil is global
procedure instead of a method/destructor of TObject.
If you have:
var
c: tsomeclass;
begin
c:=c.tsomeclass.create;
c.freeandnil
end;
then freeandnil would get, as first
On 03 Apr 2009, at 03:43, Richard Ward wrote:
5) Although I can't remember reading it anywhere, I've noticed from
my own demo programs that the addresses of objects are initially set
to nil.
That is not correct. All global variables (classes/objects or not) are
initialized to 0/nil, but
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Philippe Martinole
philippe.martin...@teleauto.org wrote:
xmi files (not xml) are used to save uml models :
On 03 Apr 2009, at 03:43, Richard Ward wrote:
A) The documentation says that for the create constructor:
(quote}
Description: Create creates a new instance of TObject. Currently it
does nothing. It is also not virtual, so there is in principle no
need to call it directly.
{unquote}
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Bummer. It writes old TP-Style object class definitions.
Bummer. :-(
Well, at least now you will have template code in umbrello to work
from to implement true Object Pascal class types. ;-)
Regards,
- Graeme
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Frank Peelo f...@eircom.net wrote:
It is on my todo list, item no. 132.458 :-)
Do you *only* have 132 todo items - lucky you ! :-)
In /his/ locale, he writes '.'
I know - my smiley face has a double meaning.
Regards,
- Graeme -
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Well, Umbrello (Open source, comes with KDE) can generate code from XMI
for various languages (C,C++,PHP, Java) except pascal. All you need to
do is write an output engine for pascal.
It is on my todo list,
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Philippe Martinole
philippe.martin...@teleauto.org wrote:
xmi files (not xml) are used to
Zitat von Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Philippe Martinole
philippe.martin...@teleauto.org wrote:
xmi files (not xml) are used to save uml models :
In our previous episode, Markus Glugla said:
(very very quick) memory as a cache as soon as practicable. I would
cache streams of measurement values (single type, sample rate circa
32KHz). The measurement program will run on diffrent machines with
diffrent RAM. Depending on the free
Hi Jonas,
thank you for your answer.
On which OS?
Debian 5.0 GNU/Linux (uname -r: 2.6.26-1-686)
Anyway, even if it would return non-zero values, the information would
be next to useless. The reason is that on modern OS'es, available
physical memory is dynamically divided between the
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Philippe Martinole
philippe.martin...@teleauto.org wrote:
xmi files (not xml) are used to save
Hi all,
due to interest i post here our generic version of a red black tree
implementation.
A R/B tree is a quite fast directory datastructure which allows o(log n) access
times.
Warning: The code compiles only under 2.2.4RC1+, below that the compilation
fails(crash).
Further info on
C) Just out of curiosity, am wondering why FreeAndNil is global procedure
instead of a method/destructor of TObject. I am guessing it is
for compatibility with Delphi which may or may not have a reason?
A method could not act the way FreeAndNil works (zeroing a local
pointer variable). It
On 4/3/09, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
I think what is meant, is that if you create a direct subclass of TObject,
there is no need to call TObject's create constructor (e.g., via inherited
create;) from your own constructors. It doesn't hurt if you do it of
course, and may be
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:08:42 +0200
Helmut Hartl helmut.ha...@firmos.at wrote:
Hi all,
due to interest i post here our generic version of a red black tree
implementation. A R/B tree is a quite fast directory datastructure
which allows o(log n) access times.
Warning: The code compiles only
Thanks Jonas and Leledumbo for your answers. Most of this makes
sense to me now. Some minor followup questions / comments (snipped)
C) Just out of curiosity, am wondering why FreeAndNil is global
procedure instead of a method/destructor of TObject.
...
c:=c.tsomeclass.create;
On 03 Apr 2009, at 16:21, Bart wrote:
So if i understand correctly:
Say I have
Type
TFoo = class;
private
fSomeField: Integer;
public
constructor Create;
end;
then
constructor TFoo.Create
begin
Inherited Create;
fSomeField := -1;
end;
would in essence be equal to
constructor
Von: Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de
Gesendet: Fr 03.04.2009 16:51
An: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org;
Betreff: Re: [fpc-pascal] Generics Red Black Tree for fpc
How much work do you think is it to extend it to accept duplicate keys?
Mattias
How probable are duplicate keys in your
Bart wrote:
On 4/3/09, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
I think what is meant, is that if you create a direct subclass of TObject,
there is no need to call TObject's create constructor (e.g., via inherited
create;) from your own constructors. It doesn't hurt if you do it of
course,
We could work on it.
Perhaps any one cold start a project for that. And others help.
My English and my knowledge in C++ is very pour. But i help any one do it.
2009/4/3 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 17:16:50 +0200
Helmut Hartl helmut.ha...@firmos.at wrote:
Von: Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de
Gesendet: Fr 03.04.2009 16:51
An: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org;
Betreff: Re: [fpc-pascal] Generics Red Black Tree for fpc
How much work do you think is it to
Von: Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de
Gesendet: Fr 03.04.2009 18:07
An: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org;
Betreff: Re: [fpc-pascal] Generics Red Black Tree for fpc
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 17:16:50 +0200
Helmut Hartl helmut.ha...@firmos.at wrote:
Von: Mattias Gaertner
28 matches
Mail list logo
