On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 06:07, Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
1) The second line in the loop contains the command std::max, how can
that be translated? I have not found any class definition for std
with a method max
There is function Max in unit Math, so you could say:
jBegin
Den 19-03-2011 08:30, Aleksa Todorovic skrev:
2) The parameter into the function is a pointer *A of type double. To
me that indicates a value of some kind, but in the code it suddenly
seems to appear as an array with indexing. What would be the proper
pascal translation of this?
Indeed. C
Jeppe Johansen jepj...@es.aau.dk wrote:
Den 19-03-2011 08:30, Aleksa Todorovic skrev:
2) The parameter into the function is a pointer *A of type double. To
me that indicates a value of some kind, but in the code it suddenly
seems to appear as an array with indexing. What would be the proper
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:30:45 +0100, Aleksa Todorovic
alexi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 06:07, Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
1) The second line in the loop contains the command std::max, how can
that be translated? I have not found any class definition for std
with a
Ingemar Ragnemalm schrieb:
Converting bad C code (that means almost any C code)
to good FPC code is a great thing to do, converting to bad FPC code is
not as much fun.
Yes, when already in progress of converting to Pascal then get rid of C
design flaws and convert to clear Pascal code.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 13:03, Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
Now I have found another very strange construct:
void ForwardModel::SetMixedBoundaryCondition(const int iElec,
const double* SX0,
const double* SY0,
const double* SZ0,
double* SX,
double* SY,
double* SZ)
On 18 Mar 2011, at 22:47, Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior wrote:
Can FPC deal with double-dispatch ?
No, because overloading works the same as in C++ (determined statically at
compile time).
Jonas___
fpc-pascal maillist -
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:10:25 +0100, Jürgen Hestermann
juergen.hesterm...@gmx.de wrote:
Ingemar Ragnemalm schrieb:
Converting bad C code (that means almost any C code)
to good FPC code is a great thing to do, converting to bad FPC code is
not as much fun.
Yes, when already in progress of
no one explained so let me try :
void ForwardModel::SetMixedBoundaryCondition(const int iElec,
void somefunction means its a pascal procedure
const double* SX0,
const has the same effect as fpc const before a parameter,
double* SX0
is the same as
double *SX0
or
double * SX0
so this
No, because overloading works the same as in C++ (determined statically at
compile time).
Are you sure, Jonas? Because I've been able to implement visitor pattern
which is a kind of double dispatch. Of course it's not implemented like the
example posted by the OP, but more like a simulation
On 19 Mar 2011, at 15:58, leledumbo wrote:
No, because overloading works the same as in C++ (determined statically at
compile time).
Are you sure, Jonas?
Yes.
Because I've been able to implement visitor pattern
which is a kind of double dispatch. Of course it's not implemented like the
In our previous episode, leledumbo said:
No, because overloading works the same as in C++ (determined statically at
compile time).
Are you sure, Jonas? Because I've been able to implement visitor pattern
which is a kind of double dispatch. Of course it's not implemented like the
example
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:30:47 -0300, Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior
jagf...@gmail.com wrote:
no one explained so let me try :
void ForwardModel::SetMixedBoundaryCondition(const int iElec,
void somefunction means its a pascal procedure
const double* SX0,
const has the same effect as fpc const
13 matches
Mail list logo
