I am lazy and want to find the easiest way to install FPC 2.6.x on
Mint Linux, which is compatible with Ubuntu.
Has anyone made a repository which can be used with apt-get?
Juha
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
I am lazy and want to find the easiest way to install FPC
2.6.x on Mint Linux, which is compatible with Ubuntu. Has
anyone made a repository which can be used with apt-get?
Grab it from the debian sid repository.
Ludo
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
2012/2/20, Ludo Brands ludo.bra...@free.fr:
Grab it from the debian sid repository.
How?
Juha
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
2012/2/20, Ludo Brands ludo.bra...@free.fr:
Grab it from the debian sid repository.
How?
Juha
2012/2/20, Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com:
2012/2/20, Ludo Brands ludo.bra...@free.fr:
Grab it from the debian sid repository.
How?
Juha
2012/2/20, Ludo Brands ludo.bra...@free.fr:
Grab it from the debian sid repository.
How?
I retract my proposal :) If you haven't installed from a foreign
distribution repository before then there are too many risks for messing up
your complete installation. You asked for an easy way: this
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has seen Pascal code around for these two tasks
1 generate level curves from an array of 3D points
2 Generate a 3D surface from an array of 3D points. Here so far my
best idea is using the marching cubes algorithm. I'd prefer only
triangles, since those fit
2012/2/20, Ludo Brands ludo.bra...@free.fr:
I retract my proposal :) If you haven't installed from a foreign
distribution repository before then there are too many risks for messing up
your complete installation. You asked for an easy way: this isn't easy when
never done something similar
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:03:02 +0200
Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/2/20, Ludo Brands ludo.bra...@free.fr:
I retract my proposal :) If you haven't installed from a foreign
distribution repository before then there are too many risks for messing up
your complete
On 20/02/12 14:03, Juha Manninen wrote:
It is funny how people still think the Debian based package system is
the best. It was so maybe 10 or 15 years ago but not any more.
These problems have nothing to do with Debian packages. You need to
install some development libraries.
Henry
I want to log the full runtime-error/exception backtrace to a file. I've
tried all methods explained
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Logging_exceptions here but none seems
to give the full backtrace. i.e. when compiled with -gl, instead of just the
address, I could also get line NN of file
Something like
http://www.sulaco.co.za/opengl_project_terrain_generation_using_heightmaps.htm
terrain ?
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/level-curve-and-surface-generation-code-tp5499029p5499298.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:59 PM, leledumbo leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id wrote:
Something like
http://www.sulaco.co.za/opengl_project_terrain_generation_using_heightmaps.htm
terrain ?
Pretty good! Unfortunatelly in my case the input is much more complex.
Here it seams to be a grid with heights
I use this units to do that. Was someone with the nickname crhonos who made.
2012/2/20 leledumbo leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id
I want to log the full runtime-error/exception backtrace to a file. I've
tried all methods explained
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Logging_exceptions here but none
2012/2/20 Henry Vermaak henry.verm...@gmail.com
On 20/02/12 14:03, Juha Manninen wrote:
It is funny how people still think the Debian based package system is
the best. It was so maybe 10 or 15 years ago but not any more.
These problems have nothing to do with Debian packages. You need to
2012/2/20 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de
Linux Mint:
That's what I did:
sudo apt-get install lazarus subversion build-essential
Now you have some old Lazarus, FPC and all needed libs.
Download the fpc+lazarus svn or zip and build the latest and greatest.
Can you build FPC
Am Monday 20 February 2012 16:09:44 schrieb Juha Manninen:
2012/2/20 Henry Vermaak henry.verm...@gmail.com
On 20/02/12 14:03, Juha Manninen wrote:
It is funny how people still think the Debian based package system is
the best. It was so maybe 10 or 15 years ago but not any more.
These
Am 20.02.2012 15:58, schrieb leledumbo:
I want to log the full runtime-error/exception backtrace to a file. I've
tried all methods explained
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Logging_exceptions here but none seems
to give the full backtrace. i.e. when compiled with -gl, instead of just the
On 20/02/2012 14:58, leledumbo wrote:
I want to log the full runtime-error/exception backtrace to a file. I've
tried all methods explained
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Logging_exceptions here but none seems
to give the full backtrace. i.e. when compiled with -gl, instead of just the
Am 20.02.2012 16:08, schrieb Everton Vieira:
I use this units to do that. Was someone with the nickname crhonos who made.
These units will only work if the debug format is Stabs and not DWARF.
Regards,
Sven
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
I've tried sometimes to do directly with the -gl and the BackTraceStrFunc
and i never was able to get the info of the error, maybe my fault. With
this units that i've passed i was able to get the info of the error with
the line number and everything else within the app.
2012/2/20 Martin
Am 20.02.2012 16:34, schrieb Martin:
If you do not want to ship with debug info:
- compile with debug info
- keep a copy of the file with debug info
- use strip[.exe] to remove the debug info from shipping version
- dump addresses
when you get the addresses, you can use gdb and the copy with
Is supposed that with the -gl and the BackTraceStrFunc would get all the
info with the line number as well? Because if is true i've seen not work
and could test again.
2012/2/20 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com
Am 20.02.2012 16:34, schrieb Martin:
If you do not want to ship with debug
Am 20.02.2012 16:52, schrieb Everton Vieira:
Is supposed that with the -gl and the BackTraceStrFunc would get all the
info with the line number as well? Because if is true i've seen not work
and could test again.
This only works if you do not strip the debug info from the executable
(either
On 20/02/2012 15:52, Everton Vieira wrote:
Is supposed that with the -gl and the BackTraceStrFunc would get all
the info with the line number as well? Because if is true i've seen
not work and could test again.
It is supposed, yes.
And it does for me.
However I read something, someone said
2012/2/20 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com
Am 20.02.2012 16:52, schrieb Everton Vieira:
Is supposed that with the -gl and the BackTraceStrFunc would get all the
info with the line number as well? Because if is true i've seen not work
and could test again.
This only works if you do
2012/2/20 Martin laza...@mfriebe.de
On 20/02/2012 15:52, Everton Vieira wrote:
Is supposed that with the -gl and the BackTraceStrFunc would get all the
info with the line number as well? Because if is true i've seen not work
and could test again.
It is supposed, yes.
And it does for me.
I just wanted to try AsyncCalls and downloaded the most recent version
2.99. But when compiling a project that uses it I get an error 'Your
compiler version is not supported'. Anybody who knows whether this can
be circumvented? Or is AsyncCalls no longer usable with Free Pascal?
On 20/02/12 11:49, Juha Manninen wrote:
2012/2/20, Ludo Brandsludo.bra...@free.fr:
Grab it from the debian sid repository.
How?
Juha
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
I use this units to do that. Was someone with the nickname crhonos who
made.
Thanks, I'll try it :)
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Logging-full-runtime-error-exception-backtrace-tp5499290p5500483.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General
The resolution of file and address can only be done if your code is a)
compiled with debug info and b) some code is available that can
translate the debug info to the output. The first is done by -g, while
the second is done by adding the l option. The latter adds the unit
lineinfo or
Hi,
I'm using TChmWriter to pack some html files into a chm file.
The index works. I don't have a TOC.
Now I want a full text search.
I set Writer.FullTextSearch to true, it takes a long time to
process and the resulting chm is 30% bigger than the total of all
files. So I guess it has created
On 02/20/12 18:00, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi,
I'm using TChmWriter to pack some html files into a chm file.
The index works. I don't have a TOC.
Now I want a full text search.
I set Writer.FullTextSearch to true, it takes a long time to
process and the resulting chm is 30% bigger than
On 02/20/12 18:00, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi,
I'm using TChmWriter to pack some html files into a chm file.
The index works. I don't have a TOC.
Now I want a full text search.
I set Writer.FullTextSearch to true, it takes a long time to
process and the resulting chm is 30% bigger than
On 02/20/12 20:51, Andrew Haines wrote:
I added an lcl program to the ccr in applications/chmmaker that I wrote
Nevermind I had forgotten it's in lazarus/tools anyway.
:)
Andrew
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On 02/20/12 18:00, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi,
I'm using TChmWriter to pack some html files into a chm file.
The index works. I don't have a TOC.
Now I want a full text search.
I set Writer.FullTextSearch to true, it takes a long time to
process and the resulting chm is 30% bigger than
35 matches
Mail list logo
