Hi, FPC and Lazaurs team
I noticed there is new component (PascalScript) ported to
lazarus/components/ and in the past AggPas also ported,
The idea, why you put many components not used for most users, same ask in
FPC
My example to understand me
I use SQLite, we found a bug and this bug fixed
Am 02.09.2012 11:46, schrieb Zaher Dirkey:
Hi, FPC and Lazaurs team
I noticed there is new component (PascalScript) ported to
lazarus/components/ and in the past AggPas also ported,
The idea, why you put many components not used for most users, same ask
in FPC
My example to understand
Il 31/08/2012 13:48, leledumbo ha scritto:
I question your assumption that
Result is specifically more important than the other incompatibilities
among different modes (i.e. your statement that it will help...a lot). I
do not say that it is wrong to be more helpful in error messages, but
rather
On 02/09/2012 11:46, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
Hi, FPC and Lazaurs team
I noticed there is new component (PascalScript) ported to
lazarus/components/ and in the past AggPas also ported,
...
I use SQLite, we found a bug and this bug fixed by FPC team, now we
must wait long time to have new
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Florian Klämpfl flor...@freepascal.orgwrote:
If somebody is interested to do so, he can do this. What does prevents
someone technically (!) from releasing SQLit unit update installers from
the currently used repository?
Partial agree, but
In another repo, you
On 2-9-2012 13:22, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Florian Klämpfl
florian-y8GAwIkqPAJpn7uciFS/b...@public.gmane.org
mailto:flor...@freepascal.org wrote:
If somebody is interested to do so, he can do this. What does prevents
someone technically (!) from releasing
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
The reason Pascalsript went into the main SVN is, that (if all goes well)
then it will be used by the IDE itself. So the IDE will need it to be build.
That is good news for me :)
I also mentioned AggPas, if it have the same
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Reinier Olislagers
reinierolislag...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't you use FPC fixes (e.g. FPC 2.6.1) then, and help backport
stable fixes from trunk to fixes?
Is that in the download page?
And is it have the last fixed for this kind of non core packages?
Best
On 2-9-2012 13:30, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Reinier Olislagers
reinierolislagers-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org
mailto:reinierolislagers-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote:
Why don't you use FPC fixes (e.g. FPC 2.6.1) then, and help
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Reinier Olislagers
reinierolislag...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a branch in the svn repository. And Lazarus builds based on fixes
2.6 appear on the snapshots page. For Linux/OSX, you'll probably find
those on the snapshots page.
For fpc only: see also
On 2-9-2012 14:10, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Reinier Olislagers
reinierolislagers-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org
mailto:reinierolislagers-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote:
It's a branch in the svn repository. And Lazarus builds based on
My goal is to make it an IDE expert so the CodeTools parser sounds ideal.
Just didn't want to reinvent the wheel. I also wanted to avoid the problem
Delphi has been plagued with for years, that is, CodeInsight flagging code
with syntax errors that the compiler readily accepts because they use
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, Kenneth Cochran wrote:
My goal is to make it an IDE expert so the CodeTools parser sounds ideal. Just
didn't want to reinvent the wheel. I also wanted
to avoid the problem Delphi has been plagued with for years, that is,
CodeInsight flagging code with syntax errors that
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Reinier Olislagers
reinierolislag...@gmail.com wrote:
Apart from that I don't really understand. Are you saying you want to
maintain your own FPC distribution that contains fixes so people can use
it to compile your software?
No :)
I need more faster release
On 02.09.2012 12:39, Giuliano Colla wrote:
Il 31/08/2012 13:48, leledumbo ha scritto:
I question your assumption that
Result is specifically more important than the other incompatibilities
among different modes (i.e. your statement that it will help...a
lot). I
do not say that it is wrong to
On 02.09.2012 11:46, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
Hi, FPC and Lazaurs team
I noticed there is new component (PascalScript) ported to
lazarus/components/ and in the past AggPas also ported,
The idea, why you put many components not used for most users, same ask
in FPC
My example to understand me
I use
16 matches
Mail list logo
