A question to those who must maintain a Linux version and a Windows versions
application.
Do you tend to cross-compile from Linux or do you compile native (with
separate projects) on each OS (Linux and Windows)?
Thanks
Brian
--
View this message in context:
On 01/27/2015 09:56 PM, Brian wrote:
A question to those who must maintain a Linux version and a Windows versions
application.
Do you tend to cross-compile from Linux or do you compile native (with
separate projects) on each OS (Linux and Windows)?
Native, because of two reasons:
-
Do you tend to cross-compile from Linux or do you compile native (with
separate projects) on each OS (Linux and Windows)?
Cross compile from Linux. I can use Wine to test Windows compatiblity and I
don't have Windows anyway :D
--
View this message in context:
Native on Windows, cross-compile for Linux.
-Original Message-
From: Brian
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:56 PM
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: [fpc-pascal] Cross-compile vs native
A question to those who must maintain a Linux version and a Windows versions
On 2015-01-27 20:56, Brian wrote:
Do you tend to cross-compile from Linux or do you compile native (with
separate projects) on each OS (Linux and Windows)?
In my experience I found that having various VM's for each target works
best. The least amount of hassle, and all VM's sync the source
In our previous episode, Bj?rn Schreiber said:
Am 26.01.2015 um 21:15 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
Since nobody else has suggested anything: is the new hardware
susceptible to alignment errors in a way that the old hardware wasn't?
The question is: how can we know? The ARM documentation
Am 26.01.2015 um 21:15 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
Since nobody else has suggested anything: is the new hardware
susceptible to alignment errors in a way that the old hardware wasn't?
The question is: how can we know? The ARM documentation says only
The processor supports unaligned accesses.
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, silvioprog wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, silvioprog wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:32 PM, silvioprog silviop...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015
Björn Schreiber wrote:
Am 26.01.2015 um 21:15 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
Since nobody else has suggested anything: is the new hardware
susceptible to alignment errors in a way that the old hardware wasn't?
The question is: how can we know? The ARM documentation says only The
processor
