On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 02:03 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2020, Dwight Schauer via fpc-pascal wrote:
> As long as the code only gets alterned into something logically
> > equivalaent, and as long as I can retreive the contents of comments
> > formatted as they were
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020, Dwight Schauer via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 23:17 +0200, Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal
wrote:
Op 2020-08-18 om 23:01 schreef Sven Barth via fpc-pascal:
> Might be the even better solution as fcl-passrc will be better
> maintained due to it being used
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 23:17 +0200, Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal
wrote:
> Op 2020-08-18 om 23:01 schreef Sven Barth via fpc-pascal:
> > Might be the even better solution as fcl-passrc will be better
> > maintained due to it being used for both the documentation utility
> > fpdoc as well as
Op 2020-08-18 om 23:01 schreef Sven Barth via fpc-pascal:
I see what I can do with ptop config and if need be see what it will
take to improve ptop. Or investigate starting over with pparser,
pastree, paswrite, as I'm already looking at those for some other
things.
Dwight Schauer via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Di., 18. Aug. 2020, 20:38:
> On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 14:11 +0200, Sven Barth wrote:
> > Not that I know. Most formatters will barf on some of the syntax
> > extensions that FPC provides (see the Jedi Code Formatter that barfs
> > on generic syntax). Even
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 14:11 +0200, Sven Barth wrote:
> Not that I know. Most formatters will barf on some of the syntax
> extensions that FPC provides (see the Jedi Code Formatter that barfs
> on generic syntax). Even ptop might fail on newer language
> extensions...
>
> So improving ptop might
Dwight Schauer via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Di., 18. Aug. 2020, 13:55:
> Is there a more robust code reformatter (command line / batch oriented)
>
that can used with free pascal? (before I start digging in to making
> ptop work to remove one's focus from style and put it solely on
> content?)
>
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 11:08 +0200, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
> ...
> There is no default configuration, because there is not one default
> standard. ...
Understood.
> Rule of thumb is that contributions should fit into the existing
> style.
In general when it comes to programming it is
Dwight Schauer via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Di., 18. Aug. 2020, 08:45:
>
> The default config generated by ptop definitely does not conform to
> the standards...
>
There is no default configuration, because there is not one default
standard. While some things are a given (lowercase identifiers, no
Hello FPC Pascal users,
Is there a default ptop.cfg somewhere that follows the FPC coding standards?
https://wiki.freepascal.org/Coding_style
I'm not looking to submit any PR in the near future, I just want to
be able to automatically reformat my code to conform to what I consider
a reasonable
10 matches
Mail list logo
