Hi all,
I'm writing a program which connects to a remote Oracle server using
sqlDB (TOracleConnection). TOracleConnection keeps telling me that
Oracle client library (libociei.dylib) is not yet installed. However,
I'm pretty sure that it's already installed correctly since Oracle's
We have already merged the wikis, what about merging the forums?
I would propose merging into the Lazarus forum.
Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or
ExtPascal)? Specially dedicated for FPC and Lazarus users. It can be a
showcase that pascal (FPC/Lazarus in
Then it would be possible to make a userfriendly forum and to add
useful
functions.
Of course, since we have all the source code that we are fluent at. :D
Another thing is... it could also be a test suite for fpWeb both on
performance and maintenance which both usually become main
if someone appear with the native pascal forum solution we will
create a site based on it and merge everything there :)
Is there someone out there had done this (pascal forum)? AFAIK, I only
knew one: Powtils forum (which is now closed). Honestly, I never used
fpWeb because I was a Powtils
Time?
I believe I could make a basic forum application within a few days, in
my spare time, using ExtPascal. But I myself don't think ExtPascal
would be the correct tool to be used since it creates a non search
engine friendly application (because of Ajax). I think fpWeb would be
the
When we planned to move the lazarus forum the same discussion was
started. It took months without result.
Because not many people know how to build a web application using
pascal. That's why I propose some of us who have experience with that
to build one. This project can be used to
So Bee, register a project on SourceForge or GitHub and start
coding. Maybe
somebody will contribute at some stage. Like they said in some old
movie:
Build it and they will come.
If I made one, then I'll make it using Powtils (fully CGI) or
ExtPascal (fully Ajax) because that's what I
Hi all,
I just knew recently that Midlet Pascal went open source, through FPC
wiki. Quite a good news, IMO. Since it's now open source, is it
possible to start working on java byte code generator in FPC based on
Midlet Pascal code? This will help FPC targetting mobile devices that
only
So I would recommend going with something closer to home (part of
FPC) -
like fpWeb. This gives much better certainty that it will be
continuously
maintained - even if that only means no new feature but at least
compilable
with latest FPC.
Yes, that's also the main reason of mine to build
Well, fpWeb is winner, yes?
Bee can create a sourceforge project?
If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I
almost know nothing about fpWeb. I even intend to study fpWeb from
this project. The project owner should be someone who knows how to
build (at least)
The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to
use
an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server.
It works with all 4 types.
Is there any demo or documentation about them, especially the FCGI? I
only saw CGI demos and very lack of documentation
Hi all,
I'm now studying Qooxdoo (JS framework) to make ExtPascal-like tool
based on it. Qooxdoo's OO implementation has mixin feature (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixin
). Since this feature is not provided by object pascal language, I
have trouble writing the library wrapper. For the
I don't think class helpers are a real language instrument. They are
more a
workaround for certain cases when other classes are set in stone.
I know, class helper is only a work around until pascal supports real
mixin feature. But, with that I'm still able to see a workaround. I
think I
On 24 Mei 2010, at 22:13, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
With CGI you have one advantage over Apache Modules or Embedded web servers,
as far as your actions do their work without errors, you don't have to
worry about possible memory leaks related to concurrency problems or threads
or anything
On 25 Mei 2010, at 24:10, Marcos Douglas wrote:
If it's already running, the CGI app acts as request proxy for the FCGI app
Would not the oposite?
Because FCGI app is the true worker app. CGI proxy is lightweight app. It does
nothing but redirecting incoming request and outgoing response,
On 25 Mei 2010, at 02:15, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Lee Jenkins l...@datatrakpos.com wrote:
Why do you need verification? That information is readily available on
ExtPascal's wiki.
http://code.google.com/p/extpascal/wiki/GettingStarted
Bee said something
On 25 Mei 2010, at 11:29, Bee Jay wrote:
On 25 Mei 2010, at 02:15, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Lee Jenkins l...@datatrakpos.com wrote:
Why do you need verification? That information is readily available on
ExtPascal's wiki.
http://code.google.com/p
On 25 Mei 2010, at 11:32, Bee Jay wrote:
Oh, did I mention live debugging? ;)
Oh, did I mention that FCGI is an open standardized protocol that is supported
by virtually any web servers? That means you could avoid vendor technology
locked-in, such as Apache mod or IIS ISAPI. ;)
-Bee
On 25 Mei 2010, at 14:06, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I have never looked at FastCGI before, but what you are descibing is
exactly what I wanted to do with CGI. Create a GUI or Service/Daemon
application (application server) that the CGI apps talks to. The
application server would setup the DB
On 25 Mei 2010, at 14:43, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
My major concern is vendor lock-in. Something we want to avoid at all costs
- we have been burnt too many times. So I'll stay away from ExtPascal
because that requires ExtJS which is a commercial product you have to
purchase (starting at
On 25 Mei 2010, at 01:43, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Leonardo M. Ramé martinr...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Marcos, nobody is saying that you don't have to destroy instances when
programming CGI apps.
Okay, but if there is not memory leaks...
I ever free my objects!
On 25 Mei 2010, at 15:12, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Seems like Graeme is not the only one who is not always listening:
Hahahaha... I know. :D When you point a finger, there are three fingers
pointing back at you! ;)
I said several times before, FastCGI exists since a long time in Free
On 25 Mei 2010, at 15:55, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The CGI gateway is on my todo list, as you know.
Now everybody knows. ;)
Obviously. I think ExtPascal is promising, but sadly suffers from some major
design flaws (garbage collect, thread model); which prevent me from
using it: they can
On 25 Mei 2010, at 17:36, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Here I can reliably reproduce the memory corruption. It crashes the output
regularly. (with random use, it happens 10-15 times a day, in a test
enviromnent).
Would you share the test code?
The bug is in the garbage collector, which
On 25 Mei 2010, at 20:31, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
But maybe the new garbage collector no longer has the problem; in that case,
my remarks are void.
I hope so. I haven't try the latest SVN either. :D
Tell him he should also get rid of the one-thread-per-session
model, because it is
On 25 Mei 2010, at 23:37, Marcos Douglas wrote:
My only doubt is: why to use CGI proxy, not a FCGI?
The main purpose of CGI proxy existence is to provide solution for some
environments where FCGI setup isn't possible. The other advantages are bonuses.
;)
-Bee-
On 26 Mei 2010, at 24:12, Marcos Douglas wrote:
If the environment allows use FCGI, you would not CGI gateway?
No, because I WANT to use those bonuses. However, by able to use the bonuses,
you can't negate the main purpose of its existence.
-Bee-
Hi all,
After a bit studying fpWeb package, especially the FCGI application, I have a
feature request to it. Would you (Joost? Michael?) please add auto shutdown
(after some idle time) feature to TFCGIApplication? If you had looked at
ExtPascal's FCGI implementation, it offers this feature.
On 28 Mei 2010, at 23:18, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Unless Joost does it first, I'll have a look at it next week. But it will be
under control of an option, and this option will be 'off' by default.
Of course. I agree with that. It'd be nicer if the option can be set from the
config file,
On 29 Mei 2010, at 15:36, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The FCL FastCGI class does not have a config file.
If you want that, you must implement that yourself.
Alright then.
It is one of the flaws of ExtPascal's implementation: everything is tied
together, using fixed formats for config files.
On 29 Mei 2010, at 16:52, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Yes, but he chooses a very restrictive approach. As it is, you must
convince him to change something. With the modular component approach, you
don't need to wait.
Why should I have to wait? I got the source code, all of them. If I need
On 28 Mei 2010, at 23:18, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I'll have a look at it next week. But it will be under control of an option,
and this option will be 'off' by default.
Another thought about this feature. I think it'd be nice if there's an option
to shutdown the app gracefully. What I
Hi all,
Try the following code snippet:
uses
DateUtils;
var
a,b: TDateTime;
i: integer;
begin
a := EncodeDateTime(2010, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0);
for i := 0 to 9 do
begin
b := EncodeDateTime(2010, 1, 1, 0, 0, i, 0);
Writeln(SecondsBetween(a,b):3);
end;
end;
I think the result
On 30 Mei 2010, at 19:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
But if you want it, it's really easy to do in fcl-web. Create a webmodule,
implement the OnRequest handler of the module, and add
Application.Terminate:=True;
Handled:=True;
in the handler. Then register the module with the name
On 30 Mei 2010, at 19:18, Marco van de Voort wrote:
IIRC this is normal and delphi compatible and due to TDatetime being a
floating point type.
No, it's not Delphi compatible. Delphi's result is alot worst, at least on
Delphi 7. And I didn't ask to make it truly compatible with Delphi. ;)
On 30 Mei 2010, at 19:28, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Then it shouldn't use floating point. Ever.
Well... then it shouldn't be using FPC? ;)
Ok, forget about the rocket launcher. The important note that I think need to
be addressed is the bug only occurs if the milisecond part of a or b is 0.
Other
On 30 Mei 2010, at 19:47, Jonas Maebe wrote:
They should not be using any FPC functionality relying on floating point. Any
person who uses floating point should know that by definition it is inexact
(ranging from a little to enormously, depending on what you do).
I understand.
That last
But if I changed the milisecond part of a or b or both to anything but 0 then
the result is correct.
Correction... the bug arises NOT only if the msec part is 0. The bug arises if
msec part of both variables are EQUAL. If they are different, at least 1 msec,
then those functions produce
On 1 Jun 2010, at 22:13, spir ☣ wrote:
(*) And to some more constructs in other languages, like foreach (*the*
feature I miss in freepascal):
foreach name in names do ... end;
http://wiki.freepascal.org/for-in_loop
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist
On 2 Jun 2010, at 20:09, spir wrote:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/for-in_loop
Is this implemented? (unable to make it work -- the compiler refuses the
for...in notation)
AFAIK, yes. At least, I know it's already in trunk since a while ago. Never use
it myself though.
-Bee-
On 18 Jun 2010, at 02:58, Burkhard Carstens wrote:
What about ExtJS being GPL licensed? Got a developer license?
Yes, if you make commercial apps.
Here you refere to the ExtJS components of fpweb, right? IOW. if those
are (or will be) universal, they should get renamed? (see, you are in
41 matches
Mail list logo
