On 23/10/2012 5:54 μμ, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2012-10-23 15:25, geneb wrote:
What about B-Tree Filer? :)
I'll read up on it, thanks.
Graeme.
A few years back I crossed roads with both flash filer and B-tree filer.
B-Tree filer is nothing more than a record based file library that
On 5/2/2013 9:44 μμ, Sven Barth wrote:
Does this fall under worst fears confirmed? At least from the POV of a
FPC user...
The first release of FireDac comes with FPC package included how well
this works or how long it will last I have no idea.
In their FAQ they only talk about Delphi XE3 and C++ builder... also
they mention in Does it work with other IDEs? No, it doesn't...
find attached a screen shot with firedac installed on lazarus 1.1 this
is just to make my point that the current release works with lazarus at
the same time
On 5/3/2013 12:42 μμ, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2013-03-01 09:48, stdreamer wrote:
find attached a screen shot with firedac installed on lazarus 1.1
Just so you know, by posting that image, you now painted a bulls-eye on
your head. You are now violating the Embarcadero FireDAC EULA, which
On 04/10/2013 9:08 μμ, Sven Barth wrote:
The main difference is that cwstring uses the Widestring manager of the
system's C library while fpwidestring is a full Pascal Widestring manager.
So by using cwstring instead of fpwidestring am I safe to assume that
the widestrings used and returned
On 04/10/2013 10:44 μμ, Sven Barth wrote:
On 04.10.2013 21:15, stdreamer wrote:
On 04/10/2013 9:08 μμ, Sven Barth wrote:
The main difference is that cwstring uses the Widestring manager of the
system's C library while fpwidestring is a full Pascal Widestring
manager.
So by using cwstring
On 27/04/2015 12:40 μμ, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Gabor Boros wrote:
Hi All,
Added ixUnique type index with IndexDefs or AddIndex, set IndexName or
IndexFieldNames. But no effect, I can add same field values without
any error.
To the best of my knowledge, this is
On 27/04/2015 18:38 μμ, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, stdreamer wrote:
On 27/04/2015 12:40 μμ, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Gabor Boros wrote:
Hi All,
Added ixUnique type index with IndexDefs or AddIndex, set IndexName or
IndexFieldNames
On 11/02/2016 17:13 μμ, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
In TPersistent, we have two virtual methods. Assign() which calls
AssignTo().
1) Why are they both virtual? It seems like Assign() is what I call a
template method, farming its work out to other helper methods - in this
case, AssignTo().
On 07/10/2016 18:33 μμ, Marcos Douglas wrote:
We don't need "clean up properly" instances that is interface-based.
If this solve the problem for contained objects, I'll do it!
BUT, if I do this I can forget all about TContainedObject or
TAggregatedObject? If I can't, this not make sense.
OK
On 07/10/2016 18:33 μμ, Marcos Douglas wrote:
The problem is: The user (programmer) needs to know (previously) if
such classes can or not be used as a contained object!
True then again that is true for all objects not only interfaces. You
need to understand what they address how they address
On 07/10/2016 16:12 μμ, Marcos Douglas wrote:
The team shouldn't know about the hierarchy; about how was implemented
these classes.
They can use TDataStream directly or as a contained object.
But as I understood, we need to use TContainedObject or
TAggregatedObject only in these "special cases"
On 07/10/2016 13:30 μμ, Tony Whyman wrote:
On 07/10/16 11:08, stdreamer wrote:
I see no rabbit hole or any other problem in the code posted so far
except perhaps lack of proper clean up which might be intentional.
A Rabbit Hole is not the same as a bug and my point is not that
"inte
On 07/10/2016 12:49 μμ, Tony Whyman wrote:
You seem to be playing around with words. Perhaps I am guilty of sloppy
English when I say "interface is copied" when meaning "an interface
reference is copied". However, this does not change the underlying problem.
The problem being referred to is the
On 05/10/2016 19:13 μμ, Tony Whyman wrote:
Marcos,
I believe I concluded that this could be a bug or feature. Either way it
is a Bear Trap waiting for the unwary programmer and it would be nice if
in some way the implementation could be improved. The problem, as I see
it is:
Basics:
1.
On 30/09/2016 17:24 μμ, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
4. And how about going even more further, and just generate an
internal GUIDs (random, or based on a memory address) when no GUID is
explicitly specified? This way "is", "as", "Supports" always just
work. And it removes the need to do 1., 2., 3.
On 13/02/2018 04:50 πμ, Terry A. Haimann wrote:
First of all, thank you for looking at this, Terry H.
To compile a cli FreePascal program to use ZeosDBO library, I assume all
I have to do is include the path to those files.
On my laptop, the files appear to be in:
On 13/02/2018 15:48 μμ, Terry A. Haimann wrote:
I really do not understand your response. If you are talking about
Lazarus, I already have it working there.
OK
I am wanting to get it to
work from a command line batch program using fpc. Using fpc I do not
know how to set required packages
On 04/04/2018 14:22 μμ, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Hm. Clearly, that means not important at all for me:
I cannot recall ever having looked at the CE logo. In fact, until 30
seconds ago, I did not even know what it stands for.
Well it is, you are just not aware of it.
It presents it self in
On 04/04/2018 12:58 μμ, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
And this kind of statement is why I don't take branding or marketing
seriously.
On one hand "..then branding is quite important" and on the other hand
"don't take it too literally".
That simply does not compute for me.
let me try to make it
On 11/3/2020 12:15 μ.μ., fredvs via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hello.
Compiling that code with fpc 3.2.0 gives the warning that follows:
---> if (kind <> tabulatorkindty(-1)) --> gives now the warning:
"msedrawtext.pas(1115,48) Warning: range check error while evaluating
constants (-1 must be between
On 10/3/2020 10:22 π.μ., Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 00:57:12 -0400
Anthony Walter via fpc-pascal wrote:
[...]
What should happen is that both examples use the function from the
last unit in the uses clause.
Yes, that's how Pascal usually works and so it works
22 matches
Mail list logo
