5
To:
Reply-To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: 2.6.0 for Solaris? And other questions [one
resolved]
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:29:28 +0200 Sven Barth
> wrote:
>
>> This might be, because you compiled it without a lib
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:29:28 +0200 Sven Barth
wrote:
This might be, because you compiled it without a libgdb which in turn is
the one who links dynamically to libc. Most FPC applications (if they
don't use threads or a WideString manager) don't require libc and thus
d
On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:29:28 +0200 Sven Barth
wrote:
> This might be, because you compiled it without a libgdb which in turn is
> the one who links dynamically to libc. Most FPC applications (if they
> don't use threads or a WideString manager) don't require libc and thus
> don't need to link to
Am 21.05.2012 14:59, schrieb microc...@zoho.com:
On Wed, 9 May 2012 17:40:40 +0200 (CEST) "Tomas Hajny" wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 16:14, microcode wrote:
Another question is on 2.6.0 on Linux. I cannot run the fp ide because
I ave glibc 2.9. The error message I get says
fp: /lib64/libc.so.6
