System used: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz with 4GB memory
FPC 2.4 64-bit under Ubuntu 8.04.2 LTS 64-bit
Which -Op??? can I use to optimize my application best for the above system?
Is -OpPENTIUMM better or worse than -OpPENTIUM4? Is any of them
appropriate for a
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Is -OpPENTIUMM better or worse than -OpPENTIUM4? Is any of them
appropriate for a Core2Quad CPU?
OK, I think I answered my own question when I tried it on my projects.
-OpATHLON64 seems to be the option for my CPU type. 'fpc -i' gives you the
available options.
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:16:53 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote about Re:
[fpc-pascal] Which -Op??? parameter is appropriate:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Is -OpPENTIUMM better or worse than -OpPENTIUM4? Is any of them
appropriate for a Core2Quad CPU?
OK, I think I answered my own question
David W Noon wrote:
If I were shipping compiled binaries, I would take a more lowest
common denominator approach, specifying an 80386 or some such.
However, I don't have that problem.
Yes, we do that for our released products too. I was simply playing around
with optimisation settings to see
