Re: [fpc-pascal] copy(), length(), and setlength() is not mentioned in fpc docs?

On Dec 5, 2007 5:18 AM, Tom Verhoeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 09:12:00AM +0100, Daniël Mantione wrote: Op Wed, 5 Dec 2007, schreef Bee: Is it just me or above methods are indeed not mentioned within fpc's doc 2.2.0? Any texts that are supposed to be a link to

Re: [fpc-pascal] copy(), length(), and setlength() is not mentioned in fpc docs?

--- Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Op Wed, 5 Dec 2007, schreef Bee: Hi all, Is it just me or above methods are indeed not mentioned within fpc's doc 2.2.0? Any texts that are supposed to be a link to above methods is not formed as a link. Just to make sure,

Re: [fpc-pascal] copy(), length(), and setlength() is not mentioned in fpc docs?

Op Wed, 5 Dec 2007, schreef Bee: Hi all, Is it just me or above methods are indeed not mentioned within fpc's doc 2.2.0? Any texts that are supposed to be a link to above methods is not formed as a link. Just to make sure, before I'll report this to mantis as a bug. :)

Re: [fpc-pascal] copy(), length(), and setlength() is not mentioned in fpc docs?

This is documentation generated with fpc 2.3.1 source code. Ah, there must be something wrong with fpc 2.2.0 generated documentation. :( BTW... where can I download laz 9.24 documentation? I'd like to convert them to chm format as well. Just like what I did to fpc doc 2.2.0. :) -Bee- has

Re: [fpc-pascal] copy(), length(), and setlength() is not mentioned in fpc docs?

Bee schreef: I have documentation of those at: http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/system/stringfunctions.html Yes, they are there on fpc doc for fpc 2.0.4. But when I open fpc doc on fpc 2.2.0, the detail pages of those routines are gone. This is documentation generated with fpc

Re: [fpc-pascal] copy(), length(), and setlength() is not mentioned in fpc docs?

I have documentation of those at: http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/system/stringfunctions.html Yes, they are there on fpc doc for fpc 2.0.4. But when I open fpc doc on fpc 2.2.0, the detail pages of those routines are gone. -Bee- has Bee.ography at:

Re: [fpc-pascal] copy(), length(), and setlength() is not mentioned in fpc docs?

Bee schreef: This is documentation generated with fpc 2.3.1 source code. Ah, there must be something wrong with fpc 2.2.0 generated documentation. :( BTW... where can I download laz 9.24 documentation? You can't, but watch this package:

Re: [fpc-pascal] copy(), length(), and setlength() is not mentioned in fpc docs?

On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 09:12:00AM +0100, Daniël Mantione wrote: Op Wed, 5 Dec 2007, schreef Bee: Is it just me or above methods are indeed not mentioned within fpc's doc 2.2.0? Any texts that are supposed to be a link to above methods is not formed as a link.

Re: [fpc-pascal] copy(), length(), and setlength() is not mentioned in fpc docs?

http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/system/stringfunctions.html That's exactly what I got. Notice that those 3 routines I mentioned are not formed as link to further explanation. -Bee- has Bee.ography at: http://beeography.wordpress.com ___

Re: [fpc-pascal] copy(), length(), and setlength() is not mentioned in fpc docs?

Bee schreef: http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/system/stringfunctions.html That's exactly what I got. Notice that those 3 routines I mentioned are not formed as link to further explanation. I have documentation of those at:

Re: [fpc-pascal] copy(), length(), and setlength() is not mentioned in fpc docs?

BTW, I like your chm documentation...it's actually much quicker to search than pdf (acroreader is slow for me with 1500 pages). And it also searches for related topics...very good job IMHO. R# 2007/12/5, Bee [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is documentation generated with fpc 2.3.1 source code. Ah,

[fpc-pascal] copy(), length(), and setlength() is not mentioned in fpc docs?

Hi all, Is it just me or above methods are indeed not mentioned within fpc's doc 2.2.0? Any texts that are supposed to be a link to above methods is not formed as a link. Just to make sure, before I'll report this to mantis as a bug. :) -Bee- has Bee.ography at: