Maybe this can be used for debug/release.
I don't see how this can be used for the widgetsets.
Why not ? you can use
subtarget=gtk2-debug
How can I pass sub targets to fppkg?
fppkg -cconfigname
You can already use this now for cross-compiling. Under Linux you can
test it with:
- Copy
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:03:08 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
[...]
Thanks.
Maybe this can be used for debug/release.
I don't see how this can be used for the widgetsets.
Why not ? you can use
subtarget=gtk2-debug
How can I pass sub targets to fppkg?
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Giuliano Colla wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt ha scritto:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2009/6/2 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
~user/.fppkg/build/
(or something like it)
Possibly the $HOME/.local/ directory. I have the following
2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
I don't think the 'freedesktop' standard is much of a standard.
Like I said, it was a mistake to have followed the 'standard'.
Well if everybody thinks like that, then NOTHING will become a
standard. The dot files idea is a mess, the FHS is
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
I don't think the 'freedesktop' standard is much of a standard.
Like I said, it was a mistake to have followed the 'standard'.
Well if everybody thinks like that, then NOTHING will become a
2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
Why ? Windows is even more of a mess as far as I'm concerned,
The only nice thing is you can query the system for some basic
applications: eg: I need to open a text file, I know notepad.exe will
exist. etc... At least now with the xdg-open
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
lot more consistent in it's config locations across various KDE based
applications. And KDE is also a lot more consistent in it's UI across
various KDE based applications.
Issues I
2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
Use Kubuntu ? I do, now.
I did for Kubuntu 9.04, and then had to revert back to 8.04 LTS
because 9.04 had to many graphics issues (X11 drawing bugs which I
reported and affected fpGUI, MSEgui and WINE). But damn, Kubuntu 9.04
did look
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu output directory for example:
units/i386-linux/
And there is no way to change this. Right?
Some LCL packages have different PPUs per widgetset, so they need an
output directory per widgetset. At the moment they
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu output directory for example:
units/i386-linux/
And there is no way to change this. Right?
Some LCL packages have different PPUs per widgetset, so they need an
output directory per
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu output directory for example:
units/i386-linux/
And there is no way to change this. Right?
Some LCL packages have different PPUs per
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu output directory for example:
units/i386-linux/
And there is no way to change
Zitat von Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu output directory for
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
2009/6/2 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
~user/.fppkg/build/
(or something like it)
Possibly the $HOME/.local/ directory. I have the following structure
in there, but I tried to find out on freedesktop.org or linux
standands what is recommend regarding the ~/.local/ directory,
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2009/6/2 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
~user/.fppkg/build/
(or something like it)
Possibly the $HOME/.local/ directory. I have the following structure
in there, but I tried to find out on freedesktop.org or linux
standands what
2009/6/2 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
What is the .local directory ? I don't have one, and I never heard of it.
If it is again a so-called standard by freedesktop, then it's a nono.
I don't know, and like I mentioned, I tried to Google it, to see who
decided on the ~/.local/ and
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu
Michael Van Canneyt ha scritto:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2009/6/2 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
~user/.fppkg/build/
(or something like it)
Possibly the $HOME/.local/ directory. I have the following structure
in there, but I tried to find out on
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu output directory for example:
units/i386-linux/
And there is no way to change this. Right?
Some LCL packages have different PPUs per widgetset, so they need an
output directory per widgetset. At the moment they use for example:
units/i386-linux-gtk2/
Another
20 matches
Mail list logo
