Hello,
Here is something that I'm asking without really know anything about
the subject, so please bear with me.
I'ved asked few places that works with Pascal (Delphi and FPC), why
does they use C as the infrastructure, and they all say that there is
not even one Pascal compiler that makes the
Am 29.04.2012 11:40, schrieb ik:
Hello,
Here is something that I'm asking without really know anything about
the subject, so please bear with me.
I'ved asked few places that works with Pascal (Delphi and FPC), why
does they use C as the infrastructure, and they all say that there is
not
On 29 Apr 2012, at 12:22, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Spent more man power into optimizer development, though some
optimizations are hard in pascal because we assume stricter aliasing
rules and because we don't have a volatile keyword.
At least as far as our current optimizers are concerned,
What would be usefull is to move the loads of code stored in
sysutils/runtime into a dll/so.
thats what makes C code look smaller, theres a nice libc (and
others) there that groups mostly used functions into a single
instance, while in pascal every executable replicates the very same
code for
On 29 Apr 2012, at 14:23, Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior wrote:
What would be usefull is to move the loads of code stored in
sysutils/runtime into a dll/so.
That's mainly useful if the external API of the RTL will ever stabilize, which
is certainly not the case today. Otherwise you create a
Am 29.04.2012 14:23, schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior:
What would be usefull is to move the loads of code stored in
sysutils/runtime into a dll/so.
thats what makes C code look smaller, theres a nice libc (and
others) there that groups mostly used functions into a single
instance, while
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 29 Apr 2012, at 14:23, Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior wrote:
What would be usefull is to move the loads of code stored in
sysutils/runtime into a dll/so.
That's mainly useful if the external API of the RTL will ever stabilize, which
is certainly not the case today.
If you deploy one executable, ok, but if you want to create a handfull
of executables (following unix logic of many small programs) then you
have a problem.
EVERY executable will have the same code again again again, i think
libraries have been created to address exactly this issue.
about the
On 29 Apr 2012, at 15:13, Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior wrote:
If you deploy one executable, ok, but if you want to create a handfull
of executables (following unix logic of many small programs) then you
have a problem.
You certainly do end up with larger executables. Whether or not this is a
Am 29.04.2012 15:13, schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior:
If you deploy one executable, ok, but if you want to create a handfull
of executables (following unix logic of many small programs) then you
have a problem.
Indeed, but I don't think this is the way FPC programs are typically used.
In our previous episode, Florian Kl?mpfl said:
make sysutils/runtime etc an external loadable library and we are
going to see FPC generate similar sized executables for similarly
sized programs.
It makes them look smaller but their footprint is actually larger so
this is exactly what Ido
Hi
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 15:50 +0200, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 29.04.2012 15:13, schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior:
If you deploy one executable, ok, but if you want to create a handfull
of executables (following unix logic of many small programs) then you
have a problem.
Indeed, but I
Am 29.04.2012 17:34, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
Hi
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 15:50 +0200, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 29.04.2012 15:13, schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior:
If you deploy one executable, ok, but if you want to create a handfull
of executables (following unix logic of many small
Hi,
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 17:38 +0200, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 29.04.2012 17:34, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
Hi
florian@ubuntu32:~$ ldd ./test
libfprtl-2.7.1.so =
/home/florian/./fpc/svn/rtl/units/i386-linux/libfprtl-2.7,
Actually, this output shows the bug already: for some
Interested people might want to have a look at
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12492
there are iirc still unprocessed patches in that report.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Am 29.04.2012 17:50, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
Hi,
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 17:38 +0200, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 29.04.2012 17:34, schrieb Thomas Schatzl:
Hi
florian@ubuntu32:~$ ldd ./test
libfprtl-2.7.1.so =
/home/florian/./fpc/svn/rtl/units/i386-linux/libfprtl-2.7,
Actually, this
16 matches
Mail list logo
