Hello,
here's a minimal Pascal program to call XGetWindowProperty:
https://www.syncovery.com/minimalxtest.pas
Cheers,
Tobias
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 23:22:01 +0200
Pierre Muller wrote:
>
>
> Le 26/08/2019 à 22:46, tobiasgie...@gmail.com a écrit :
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> > fantastic, that
Am 27. August 2019 15:03:46 schrieb tobiasgie...@gmail.com:
> Hello,
>
> yes I will send you a minimal program to call XGetWindowProperty.
>
> Cheers,
> Tobias
>
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:35:01 +0200
> Pierre Muller wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> the testsuite results show no difference,
>>
Hello,
yes I will send you a minimal program to call XGetWindowProperty.
Cheers,
Tobias
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:35:01 +0200
Pierre Muller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the testsuite results show no difference,
> this probably means that we have no test that checks
> GCC compatibility for more than
Hi,
the testsuite results show no difference,
this probably means that we have no test that checks
GCC compatibility for more than 8 parameters...
Tobias, could you send us a small source that allows to check this?
Thanks in advance,
Pierre
Le 26/08/2019 à 00:59, tobiasgie...@gmail.com a
schrieb am Di., 27. Aug. 2019, 01:38:
> If anybody would like a near silent POWER9 system at home,
> I can really recommend the new Blackbird mainboard with CPU bundles
> from Raptor CS. The lower cost 4-core CPU uses so little power you
> hardly even need a fan for it.
>
If only it wouldn't
Hi Pierre,
wow that was fast and it works now! Lazarus (trunk) now compiles and
runs without any changes on a POWER9 machine in little endian mode :=)
Very beautiful! I couldn't be happier. Good work everyone!
I'm running it on Ubuntu but I have also installed a few other Linux
distributions,
Le 26/08/2019 à 22:46, tobiasgie...@gmail.com a écrit :
> Hi Jonas,
>
> fantastic, that looks great. I think now I can just wait until Pierre
> Muller's snapshot is updated :=)
As I followed the thread, I made a special issue for you,
you should find the new snapshot of ftp site:
$ cat
Hi Jonas,
fantastic, that looks great. I think now I can just wait until Pierre
Muller's snapshot is updated :=)
Cheers,
Tobias
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:42:37 +0200
Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 26/08/2019 20:56, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> > On 26/08/2019 20:54, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> >> Am
On 26/08/2019 20:56, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 26/08/2019 20:54, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>> Am 26.08.2019 um 20:52 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
>>> On 26/08/2019 14:22, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 26. August 2019 14:08:39 schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
:
> Florian Klämpfl schrieb am
On 26/08/2019 20:54, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Am 26.08.2019 um 20:52 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
>> On 26/08/2019 14:22, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>>> Am 26. August 2019 14:08:39 schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
>>> :
>>>
Florian Klämpfl schrieb am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019,
14:01:
> Try to
Am 26.08.2019 um 20:52 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> On 26/08/2019 14:22, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>> Am 26. August 2019 14:08:39 schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
>> :
>>
>>> Florian Klämpfl schrieb am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019,
>>> 14:01:
>>>
Try to change the 48 in fpc/compiler/powerpc64/cpupara.pas
On 26/08/2019 14:22, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 26. August 2019 14:08:39 schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> :
>
>> Florian Klämpfl schrieb am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019,
>> 14:01:
>>
>>> Try to change the 48 in fpc/compiler/powerpc64/cpupara.pas line to 32 as a
>>> temporary test.
>>
>> Line 302 in
schrieb am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019, 19:53:
> Hello,
>
> trying to recompile now ... since ppc64le support is not in 3.0.4, I
> suppose I need to use a more recent version to compile it. So there is
> no advantage in cross-compiling and I might as well try it with the
> latest native fpc compiler?
>
>
Hello,
trying to recompile now ... since ppc64le support is not in 3.0.4, I
suppose I need to use a more recent version to compile it. So there is
no advantage in cross-compiling and I might as well try it with the
latest native fpc compiler?
So I need to fix compiler errors myself, is that
Hello,
many thanks, I will try it!
I haven't compiled FPC for ppc64le myself so it can take a few days
but I will let you know about the result.
Cheers,
Tobias
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:22:01 +0200
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 26. August 2019 14:08:39 schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> :
Am 26. August 2019 14:08:39 schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
:
> Florian Klämpfl schrieb am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019,
> 14:01:
>
>> Am 26. August 2019 00:59:16 schrieb tobiasgie...@gmail.com:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> while examining a crash when running Lazarus on ppc64le, I found the
>>>
Florian Klämpfl schrieb am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019,
14:01:
> Am 26. August 2019 00:59:16 schrieb tobiasgie...@gmail.com:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > while examining a crash when running Lazarus on ppc64le, I found the
> > following issue in function calls.
> >
> >
> > Calls to functions with more than
Am 26. August 2019 00:59:16 schrieb tobiasgie...@gmail.com:
> Hello,
>
>
> while examining a crash when running Lazarus on ppc64le, I found the
> following issue in function calls.
>
>
> Calls to functions with more than eight parameters seem to be
> implemented differently from how gcc does it
Hello,
while examining a crash when running Lazarus on ppc64le, I found the
following issue in function calls.
Calls to functions with more than eight parameters seem to be
implemented differently from how gcc does it in a C program.
gcc uses the memory location 96(r1) for the ninth parameter,
19 matches
Mail list logo
