To declare conditional defines like this easily:
{$ifdef cpu64}
TMyInteger = Int64;
{$else}
TMyInteger = LongInt;
{$endif}
You can better use the special type for it directly instead of adding
$ifdef's
TMyInteger = PtrInt;
TMyWord = PtrUInt;
People following the svn changes recently might have noticed that a lot of
changes regarding win64 happened. So we're proud to announce the first
x86_64-win64 snapshot which is also probably the first available OSS compiler
for win64.
Is there any publication page about this, on the wiki or fpc
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, constantijnw wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
And of course the documentation:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.html
more
Bisma Jayadi wrote:
People following the svn changes recently might have noticed that a
lot of
changes regarding win64 happened. So we're proud to announce the first
x86_64-win64 snapshot which is also probably the first available OSS
compiler
for win64.
Is there any publication page
People following the svn changes recently might have noticed that a lot of
changes regarding win64 happened. So we're proud to announce the first
x86_64-win64 snapshot which is also probably the first available OSS compiler
for win64.
Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
constantijnw wrote:
Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
What do you mean with this?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
constantijnw wrote:
Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
What do you mean with this?
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
constantijnw wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
constantijnw wrote:
Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
What do you mean with this?
___
fpc-pascal
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
constantijnw wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
constantijnw wrote:
Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
What do you mean with this?
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
And of course the documentation:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.html
more specifically:
constantijnw wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
And of course the documentation:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.html
more specifically:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
constantijnw wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
And of course the documentation:
constantijnw wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
constantijnw wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
And of course the documentation:
14 matches
Mail list logo
