Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] fpc and intel vtune (now about gprof)

2006-04-26 Thread Peter Vreman
I hope you can see the difference between a linker, which is needed no matte how you want to use the compiler, and a tool like Valgrind or gprof. VS With this difference, compiling -gv succeeds, even if Valgrind is not VS installed. Compiling -pg fails, if gprof/cygwin is not installed.

Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] fpc and intel vtune (now about gprof)

2006-04-25 Thread Пётр Косаревский
Sorry, eight questions ahead (first two are important to me). -Original Message- From: Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Пётр Косаревский [EMAIL PROTECTED],FPC-Pascal users discussions fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:57:55 +0200 Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] fpc and intel vtune (now about gprof)

2006-04-25 Thread Tomas Hajny
đŁÔŇ ëĎÓÁŇĹ×ÓËÉĘ wrote: Sorry, eight questions ahead (first two are important to me). . . Last time I used gprof on win32, it worked fine? Well, not long ago I was told in these maillists, that gprof requires cygwin under win32 for FPC. Is it normal, that compiler (linking stage) tells:

Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] fpc and intel vtune (now about gprof)

2006-04-25 Thread ϸ�� ����������� � mail.ru
I hope you can see the difference between a linker, which is needed no matte how you want to use the compiler, and a tool like Valgrind or gprof. VS With this difference, compiling -gv succeeds, even if Valgrind is not VS installed. Compiling -pg fails, if gprof/cygwin is not installed. VS