On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:44:55 +0200 (CEST)
mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
>[...]
> ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/mirrors/fpc/beta/3.0.4-rc1/
The fpc-3.0.4-0.rc1.x86_64.rpm does not work on Fedora 21 x86_64:
Free Pascal Compiler version 3.0.4rc1 [2017/07/02] for x86_64
Copyright (c) 1
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
> >[...]
> > ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/mirrors/fpc/beta/3.0.4-rc1/
>
> The fpc-3.0.4-0.rc1.x86_64.rpm does not work on Fedora 21 x86_64:
>
> Free Pascal Compiler version 3.0.4rc1 [2017/07/02] for x86_64
> Copyright (c) 1993-2017 by Florian Klaem
I’m seeing feature this in other languages and it’s pretty useful. Has anyone
ever considered this for Pascal?
Instead of declaring a method in the class (or other function) it’s written
inline from the callers scope and inherits from that scope. The only advantage
is readability since everythi
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 10:52:35 -0600
Ryan Joseph wrote:
>[...]
Note that "inline" functions in FPC have a different meaning:
https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu36.html
What you mean are "anonymous functions" or "closures".
State in FPC:
http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel
On 02.08.2017 09:29, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
FPC "forces" nothing. It offers a single-byte string TStrings
implementation.
If you want to use that for Unicode, you indeed have no choice but to
use UTF8
or use/write a separate class that uses UTF16.
That is why I said that it is less sil
