Re: [fpc-pascal] Managed record questions

Am 08.03.2018 04:44 schrieb "Ryan Joseph" : 1) Given the example below we have a template for a standard ref counted record. Shouldn’t there be some “meta record” type that implements this automatically? I’m thinking about adding this to some types but the idea of

[fpc-pascal] Managed record questions

So in the trunk we have managed records now which is a brilliant addition and long overdue. Some questions these bring up: 1) Given the example below we have a template for a standard ref counted record. Shouldn’t there be some “meta record” type that implements this automatically? I’m

Re: [fpc-pascal] Managed record questions

2018-03-08 4:13 GMT+01:00 Ryan Joseph : > 1) Given the example below we have a template for a standard ref counted > record. Shouldn’t there be some “meta record” type that implements this > automatically? I’m thinking about adding this to some types but the idea of >

Re: [fpc-pascal] Managed record questions

2018-03-08 7:48 GMT+01:00 Sven Barth via fpc-pascal < fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>: > You could use an include file containing both the declaration and > implementation controlled by compiler defines together with a macro for the > type name. > Very improper and totally bad approach. This is

Re: [fpc-pascal] Managed record questions

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 1:48 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal > wrote: > > You could use an include file containing both the declaration and > implementation controlled by compiler defines together with a macro for the > type name. That’s a nice trick. If those