Re: [fpc-pascal] Realtime and freepascal???

On 06/15/2018 04:17 AM, Darius Blaszyk wrote: Hi all, Thanks for all the feedback I got. I am looking into different solutions and admittedly I'm at a loss. For the data acquisition part I indeed will not be using an MPU. Instead I found some good references to using arduino in a master / slave

Re: [fpc-pascal] AVX512 in ASM - From where should I start?

Am 14.06.2018 um 23:17 schrieb Joao Schuler: AWESOME NEWS! Thank you. Should I start by adding more tasm*.pp testing files at  fpc/branches/tg74/avx512/tests/test/ specific for AVX512 ? Just look at the directory I mentioned. AVX1/2 is tested using automated tools which generate automatically

[fpc-pascal] I am trying to install zeosdbo

I am trying to install zeosdbo onto my Lazarus install and am getting the following error during the rebuild: Build IDE: Exit code 512, Errors: 1lazarus.pp(1,1) Fatal: Cannot find aarrebase used by Lazarus. Check if package aarrebase creates aarrebase.ppu, check nothing deletes this file and check

[fpc-pascal] record alignment

I have a struct I need to port from C but the size I’m getting in Pascal is wrong. From C sizeof(AAPLVertex) = 32 but in Pascal sizeof(AAPLVertex) = 24. The alignment of the struct is on 32 bit bounds I think but how do I replicate this in Pascal so it behaves exactly like c? I tried using

Re: [fpc-pascal] Realtime and freepascal???

Hi all, Thanks for all the feedback I got. I am looking into different solutions and admittedly I'm at a loss. For the data acquisition part I indeed will not be using an MPU. Instead I found some good references to using arduino in a master / slave setup. The master will poll all slaves over I2C

Re: [fpc-pascal] record alignment

Hi, On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Ryan Joseph wrote: > I have a struct I need to port from C but the size I’m getting in Pascal > is wrong. From C sizeof(AAPLVertex) = 32 but in Pascal > sizeof(AAPLVertex) = 24. > > The alignment of the struct is on 32 bit bounds I think but how do I > replicate this in

Re: [fpc-pascal] record alignment

> On Jun 15, 2018, at 3:45 PM, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) > wrote: > > The whole idea of a packed record is to ignore alignment and "pack" the > fields ignoring padding and alignment. Use a normal record without > "packed", or add the padding fields manually, if you still have to use a >