Am 26.07.2018 um 02:31 schrieb Vojtěch Čihák:
Hello,
I needed to extend TFPGObjectList and I found two wierd things (FPC
3.1.1 r39507):
program project1;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
uses
Classes, FGL;
type
TBaseClass = class (TObject)
end;
TIDClass = class (TBaseClass)
ID:
Hello,
I needed to extend TFPGObjectList and I found two wierd things (FPC 3.1.1
r39507):
program project1;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
uses
Classes, FGL;
type
TBaseClass = class (TObject)
end;
TIDClass = class (TBaseClass)
ID: Integer;
end;
TNameIDClass = class (TIDClass)
El mar., 24 jul. 2018 a las 13:57, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal (<
fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>) escribió:
> Matias Vara schrieb am Di., 24. Juli 2018, 11:04:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am writing my own __FPC_specific_handler() but I can't figure out when
>> this function is registered. I guess this
Matias Vara schrieb am Mi., 25. Juli 2018, 12:55:
>
> El mar., 24 jul. 2018 a las 13:57, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal (<
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>) escribió:
>
>> Matias Vara schrieb am Di., 24. Juli 2018, 11:04:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am writing my own __FPC_specific_handler() but I
El mié., 25 jul. 2018 a las 14:33, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal (<
fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>) escribió:
> Matias Vara schrieb am Mi., 25. Juli 2018, 12:55:
>
>>
>> El mar., 24 jul. 2018 a las 13:57, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal (<
>> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>) escribió:
>>
>>> Matias
Il 23/07/2018 18:11, Ryan Joseph ha scritto:
The spirit of the language is really hard to define in my opinion.
To the contrary, in an Open Source project, it is the easiest thing to
define.
It is what the core developers deem to be the spirit of the language.
That's all.
One should never
