Re: [fpc-pascal] TProcess.CurrentDirectory doc

Op 07/07/2020 om 07:44 schreef Michael Van Canneyt: need more info there! a) what happens when the process, eg Bash file, changes its working dir (via "cd") many times and I read CurrentDirectory eg during OnReadData (ASyncProcess)? do I get changed cur-dir, or initial dir? b) do i get

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for Win64

Am Dienstag, 7. Juli 2020, 09:42:54 CEST schrieb Marco van de Voort: > Op 07/07/2020 om 09:14 schreef Rainer Stratmann: > > For Linux: Does that mean apt-get install lazarus is always the 32bit > > version? Regardless of the Linux Version (32bit or 64bit). > > No. The reason for no 64-bit

Re: [fpc-pascal] Codetools, identity nodes from includes

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:09:09 +0700 Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2020, at 4:57 AM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal > > wrote: > > > > Something like this: > > > > Node:=AItem.Node; > > if Node<>nil then > > begin > > Scanner:=Tool.Scanner; Scanner:=AItem.Tool.Scanner; > >

[fpc-pascal] fpDebug function-call proof-of-concept

Hi all, Last weekend I started on the ability to evaluate functions within fpDebug. And I got quite far. It is a proof-of-concept, still needs a lot of work. But it works! See it in action here: http://amira.cnoc.nl/fpc/FpDebugCallProofOfconcept.gif Regards, Joost.

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for Win64

Op 07/07/2020 om 09:14 schreef Rainer Stratmann: For Linux: Does that mean apt-get install lazarus is always the 32bit version? Regardless of the Linux Version (32bit or 64bit). No. The reason for no 64-bit compiler is specific to Windows 64-bit.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Codetools, identity nodes from includes

> On Jul 7, 2020, at 4:57 AM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal > wrote: > > Something like this: > > Node:=AItem.Node; > if Node<>nil then > begin > Scanner:=Tool.Scanner; > LinkIndex:=Scanner.LinkIndexAtCleanPos(Node.StartPos); > if LinkIndex<0 then >// dangling node, e.g. syntax

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for Win64

Am Samstag, 4. Juli 2020, 20:02:39 CEST schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys: > On 02/07/2020 9:30 pm, Evert van Dijken via fpc-pascal wrote: > > I see a WIN32 compiler and a WIN64 cross > > compiler. How it works is a mystery for me. > > I never understood the choice FPC made to not create a native 64-bit

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc-pascal Digest, Vol 193, Issue 2

On 2020-07-03 18:44, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: Can it be that you replied to the wrong message? ;) (see below) I suspect that it was an automated reply (out-of-office message). :/ Ceterum censeo automated replies delenda sunt. ;-) Let's take it as an opportunity to remind everybody

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for Win64

On 2020-07-07 10:28, Rainer Stratmann wrote: Am Dienstag, 7. Juli 2020, 09:42:54 CEST schrieb Marco van de Voort: Op 07/07/2020 om 09:14 schreef Rainer Stratmann: > For Linux: Does that mean apt-get install lazarus is always the 32bit > version? Regardless of the Linux Version (32bit or 64bit).

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpDebug function-call proof-of-concept

Joost van der Sluis schrieb am Di., 7. Juli 2020, 11:17: > Hi all, > > Last weekend I started on the ability to evaluate functions within > fpDebug. And I got quite far. It is a proof-of-concept, still needs a > lot of work. But it works! > > See it in action here: > >

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpDebug function-call proof-of-concept

Op 07-07-2020 om 12:41 schreef Christo Crause via fpc-pascal: On Tue, 7 Jul 2020, 11:17 Joost van der Sluis, > wrote: Last weekend I started on the ability to evaluate functions within fpDebug. And I got quite far. It is a proof-of-concept, still needs a lot

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpDebug function-call proof-of-concept

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020, 11:17 Joost van der Sluis, wrote: > Hi all, > > Last weekend I started on the ability to evaluate functions within > fpDebug. And I got quite far. It is a proof-of-concept, still needs a > lot of work. But it works! > Great news! I guess this is a step towards evaluating

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc-pascal Digest, Vol 193, Issue 2

Tomas Hajny schrieb am Di., 7. Juli 2020, 14:33: > On 2020-07-03 18:44, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: > > Can it be that you replied to the wrong > > message? ;) (see below) > > I suspect that it was an automated reply (out-of-office message). :/ > Ceterum censeo automated replies delenda

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpDebug function-call proof-of-concept

Op 07-07-2020 om 14:17 schreef Sven Barth via fpc-pascal: Joost van der Sluis mailto:jo...@cnoc.nl>> schrieb am Di., 7. Juli 2020, 11:17: Hi all, Last weekend I started on the ability to evaluate functions within fpDebug. And I got quite far. It is a proof-of-concept, still

[fpc-pascal] properties // Re: fpDebug function-call proof-of-concept

On 07/07/2020 15:04, Joost van der Sluis wrote: Op 07-07-2020 om 12:41 schreef Christo Crause via fpc-pascal: Great news! I guess this is a step towards evaluating object properties via get methods? That is the final goal, yes. For this, we will need to start looking at improving the