/Reposted with correct branch identifier/.
I thought that a fixes branch was only for bug fixes and not for
issuing non-backwards compatible changes. However, TFieldType in
db.pas now has 6 extra elements.
The result is that IBX no longer compiles with the fixes_3_2 branch. I
have also
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Tony Whyman via fpc-pascal wrote:
Yes - but is that really a bug fix that justifies a non-backwards
compatible change?
That's up for debate of course.
Probably it was needed as prerequisite for other bugfixes.
Michael.
___
Yes - but is that really a bug fix that justifies a non-backwards
compatible change?
On 17/10/2021 11:09, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Tony Whyman via fpc-pascal wrote:
/Reposted with correct branch identifier/.
I thought that a fixes branch was only for
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Tony Whyman via fpc-pascal wrote:
/Reposted with correct branch identifier/.
I thought that a fixes branch was only for bug fixes and not for issuing
non-backwards compatible changes. However, TFieldType in db.pas now has 6
extra elements.
The result is that IBX no
/Reposted with correct branch identifier/.
I thought that a fixes branch was only for bug fixes and not for issuing
non-backwards compatible changes. However, TFieldType in db.pas now has
6 extra elements.
The result is that IBX no longer compiles with the fixes_3_2 branch. I
have also
