> To declare conditional defines like this easily:
>
> {$ifdef cpu64}
> TMyInteger = Int64;
> {$else}
> TMyInteger = LongInt;
> {$endif}
You can better use the special type for it directly instead of adding
$ifdef's
TMyInteger = PtrInt;
TMyWord = PtrUInt;
___
Bisma Jayadi wrote:
>> People following the svn changes recently might have noticed that a
>> lot of
>> changes regarding win64 happened. So we're proud to announce the first
>> x86_64-win64 snapshot which is also probably the first available OSS
>> compiler
>> for win64.
>
> Is there any publicat
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, constantijnw wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
And of course the documentation:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.html
more specificall
People following the svn changes recently might have noticed that a lot of
changes regarding win64 happened. So we're proud to announce the first
x86_64-win64 snapshot which is also probably the first available OSS compiler
for win64.
Is there any publication page about this, on the wiki or fpc
constantijnw wrote:
> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>> constantijnw wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>>
> http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
>
>
>
And of course the document
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
constantijnw wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
And of course the documentation:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.ht
constantijnw wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
>>>
>>>
>>
>> And of course the documentation:
>>
>> http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.html
>>
>> more speci
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
And of course the documentation:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.html
more specifically:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/p
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> constantijnw wrote:
> > Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> >> constantijnw wrote:
> >>
> >>> Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
> >>> between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
> >>>
> >>
> >> What do y
constantijnw wrote:
> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>> constantijnw wrote:
>>
>>> Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
>>> between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
>>>
>>
>> What do you mean with this?
>>
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
constantijnw wrote:
Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
What do you mean with this?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@list
constantijnw wrote:
> Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
> between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
What do you mean with this?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fr
Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
13 matches
Mail list logo
