with the integrated UPEK (147e:2016) in my
laptop, so any clues here?
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Martin Hejnfelt
___
fprint mailing list
fprint@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 08:15 +0100, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Martin Hejnfelt mar...@duffman.dk wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 13:19 +0100, Patrick Marlier wrote:
Indeed first capture looks fine even though 354 lines are removed from
the capture. How fast did you
it
work in a production environment which however should happen within some weeks.
Regards,
Martin Hejnfelt
div Oprindelig meddelelse /divdivFra: Jimmy Jeppesen
ji...@mobi.dk /divdivDato:30/07/2014 10.21 (GMT+01:00) /divdivTil:
Martin Hejnfelt mar...@duffman.dk /divdivCc: Jimmy
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 11:49 -0200, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Sorry, I missed your message about still having a failling URU4000.
BTW, I haven't tested the fix on my system, I just took the bug for
fixed.. :(
So, still pending some time to find out why it works in Fedora 20 and
fails in
throw $85 at it, I would be happy to
know :) Question is if it would be as simple as adding the new PID to
libfprint.
Kind regards,
Martin Hejnfelt
___
fprint mailing list
fprint@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo
Hi Arjoonn,
On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 23:17 +0530, Arjoonn Sharma wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a device prebuilt into my laptop
>
It's always nice to get some USB information, usually lsusb output gives
a good idea about the device...
> which has denied all my efforts to get it to work under Linux.
